Galt's Gulch

Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

    -
  • 14
    Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 9 months ago
    Not until he has been legally elected by the Electoral College and there are no more legal challenges.
    He is a big security risk based on the allegations of corruption against him and his family.
    Given his mental ability, I wouldn't trust him with anything beyond his personal bathroom.

    I don't trust anyone in the federal government with the security of America, nor with the personal information already illegally accumulated by the "intelligence" agencies.

    I also think the Georgia legislature should delay the runoffs for senators until after the allegations of election corruption have been resolved since those allegations may even change the need for one of the runoffs.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
      -
    • Posted by preimert1 4 years, 9 months ago
      Yes, but if he eventually prevails, his people ought to be aware of crucial information that might affect yhe security of the country during the transition period to avoid being blind-sided if they have to start from zero.

      I liken the transition period to a relay race where the baton should be handed off smoothly. Right now it seems like the baton is being dropped on the ground and there is a squable about who should pick it up. Meanwhile yhe race (China et al) goes on.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 9 months ago
        As I said, when he has been legally elected and there are no more legal challenges, then Buydem under law must be allowed access to security briefings.
        He should receive only what is required by law. At this point he has no more right to secure information than any other person.
        The Trump administration is still in charge and should remain so until a new president is sworn in.
        Your concern should be: the sooner Buydem has access the sooner he can sell us out to China and every other competitor country in the entire universe. That will make any negotiation for the American people by the existing administration impossible.
        Buydem is a traitor.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        -
      • Posted by $ gharkness 4 years, 9 months ago
        IMO, if there’s a “but,” there’s not a “Yes.” If there’s a “Yes,” there’s not a “but.” At least not in this situation.

        He has either earned it or he hasn’t. To date, he hasn’t legit earned it. If proven he. DID earn it, I’d still be reluctant but one must follow the law.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 9 months ago
          "Just following orders" is not a phrase that I plan to recite in the future. I will not do what Buydem says regardless of his status or title unless I think the action is ethical. I expect to disregard most of what comes from the Dark Center if Buy dem is given the office.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by dmshuler 4 years, 9 months ago
        I believe the word "if" is the key in your post, preimert1. That is one heckuvan if. The information belongs to Biden and his team only IF they have been duly elected to receive that information. Caution is warranted possibly more with this potential POTUS than with any other, in my humble opinion.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 4 years, 9 months ago
    NO!...they haven't been officially declared the winners of the election...there are ongoing legal investigations. the GSA has indicated that and will brief some committee on the process next week.

    It's like a wedding...if anyone objects to the biden/harris couple wedding the USA then please speak now or forever hold your piece!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Meerkat24 4 years, 9 months ago
    So they could leak stuff that can't be refuted or corrected or explained without further disclosing national security secrets? No, I don't think so.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    -
  • Posted by $ AJAshinoff 4 years, 9 months ago
    No, until such time the matter of legitimacy is settled he's just a known untrustworthy piece of shit leftist with no authority beyind being a candidate.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ gharkness 4 years, 9 months ago
      And after.....still just an untrustworthy piece of shit PEDOPHILE leftist, with the full authority of the US Government behind him, which is what keeps ME awake at night.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Joseph23006 4 years, 9 months ago
    Considering all the crap the Democrats have flung at President Trump since he first tossed his hat in the ring, as they used to say, his team can just cool their heels until he is CERTIFIED as President-elect which won't happen until the Electoral College meets in December. Besides that, none on his team can actually be trusted to be privy to sensitive information because they have been notorious leakers and that could jeopardize any ongoing negotiations or talks with other countries, this President IS President until January, a technicality the Biden team seems to overlook. Nothing is secure when Democrats get ahold of it!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    -
  • Posted by Katrina41 4 years, 9 months ago
    After the Gore/Bush election, all transfer of power information, clearances, etc. were withheld from the incoming Bush team for 37 days, until the legal challenge were settled and the election was certified, as was proper under the law. This election has not yet been certified and the legal challenges have not been settled, yet their team has started receiving all the classified and requisite information as of this week as the transition begins. The incoming administration begins its term as lawbreakers given the keys to a kingdom they don't yet own.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ allosaur 4 years, 9 months ago
      Should Quid Pro Quo Joe fail to steal the election, no telling what classified information his "people" would want to leak if out of sheer spite if given "keys to the kingdmon" way too early.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by wmiranda 4 years, 9 months ago
    Not until all challenges to this national elections fraud is over and it is determined that he is in fact the president elect. Doing so prematurely may put national security at risk for which Dems are famous for doing.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by GaryL 4 years, 9 months ago
    His team has been getting regular security briefings ever since he was the presumptive candidate!
    The GSA determines when the President-Elect can begin setting up his offices and paying his staff and cabinet and that should happen after the electors decide who won and not before. Legal challenges could take months or even years but it seems clear the SCOTUS will have to be involved in the very near future.
    What is happening right now is precisely what PDJT warned us all about long before the election. There are lots of irregularities ruled upon by those entities that have no authority to make such rulings. The only entities that have a "Constitutional" legal say in the election processes are the Legislators of each state and not the courts or AGs. There is a ton of crap tossed into this election and it all needs to be adjudicated before there is any clear winner declared. At this very moment what is going on is a massive attempt at running out the clock. I will wait!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 4 years, 8 months ago
    Short answer: No.

    There are security briefings and then there are action briefings. Very different animals which frequently get confused. No one but the acting President has access to the action briefings which are daily - assuming of course that the President is there (Obama didn't bother going to them). Current evaluations of other nations and strategic initiatives are commonly shared once an election has been settled and this one is far from that. Biden still hasn't been certified with the necessary 272 votes, neither has the Electoral College voted. Thus Biden hasn't secured the necessary qualifications - regardless his abysmal record as a security risk - to have those briefings.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Stormi 4 years, 8 months ago
    What is there they don't don't already, as Obama said as he left the WH, "I have my shadow government." Their people already working behind the scenes, nothing new.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo