Should our government have a “kill switch” to turn off cell phone communication?
Posted by deleted 10 years, 12 months ago to Government
Who would agree with this?
You type: | You see: |
---|---|
*italics* | italics |
**bold** | bold |
While we're very happy to have you in the Gulch and appreciate your wanting to fully engage, some things in the Gulch (e.g. voting, links in comments) are a privilege, not a right. To get you up to speed as quickly as possible, we've provided two options for earning these privileges.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
Consider...if you were a terrorist...which would you take out, if you had to choose, cell towers or power substations?
And people were.
Urban rumour later was that it was to prevent the knowledge of the deaths getting out there
about things which they were elected to Reject? -- j
Ask me about the "Pay Per Mile" program that On Star and all those services are going to be used for with the imbedded road RFID sensors.
It has already been tested in MA and MI and IL.
Is such an act to secure the rights of its citizens? Does the action violate rights? If the answers are yes and no (respectively), then it is consistent with the proper role of any government. If that isn't the answers, then no.
Now asking a question closer to the original: as far as a gov HAVING the ability or means of carrying out such an act? I think the form that the means take is a non-essential issue, so long as rights aren't violated.
Now should our government have the means? No. They've demonstrated time and again that they are not interest in securing rights when it comes to implementing a totalitarian agenda.
Load more comments...