While we're very happy to have you in the Gulch and appreciate your wanting to fully engage, some things in the Gulch (e.g. voting, links in comments) are a
privilege, not a right. To get you up to speed as quickly as possible, we've provided two options for earning these privileges.
- You must reach a Gulch score of 100. You can earn points in the Gulch by posting content, commenting, or by other members voting up your posts.
- You may upgrade to a Galt's Gulch Producer membership to immediately gain these privileges.
Your current Gulch score:
That in itself wouldn't say anything about Gates, but the meetings with Epstein and Gates' flirting with employees looks suspicious. It could certainly all be innocent or it could be a pattern.
What man doesn't have any baggage in 'romantic' dealings with women?
It's exceedingly rare that the goals of a man and a woman are mutually beneficial, imo.
Women and men do not think 'rationally' in the same ways. (trying to channel JP Sears;^)
That said, this is not an important issue that deserves much exposure.
What is really going on that the NYT (and their accomplices) wish to use this to distract attention from?
I don't like what Gates is proposing (and acting on) now, but trial by MSM (with little or no evidence) is not a fair trial.
What is the real news that the left wants to hide as they use this as a distraction?
Imagine if you were in Gates position and were innocent of all this innuendo, like the way Trump was treated by the media for 4 years.
Is there any truth at all here or is this just another hit job by the MSM?