Government looting and the effectiveness of shrugging

Posted by LionelHutz 12 years, 2 months ago to Economics
121 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

In the days of old, our government funded itself by taxing the people through various means, but most prominently by the Income Tax.
As the government becomes the primary looter, the means of revolt expressed in Atlas Shrugged makes a lot of sense.
One deprives the government of their loot by depriving them of your production.
(They can't tax what you don't make).

However, I think we have been in a new era for a while now.
We are in an era where the government doesn't need your tax money.

Think about this. We already know Social Security and Medicare are going to go broke. We've known it for years.
So what sane politician says lets expand the program (Medicare D), and then cut the revenue stream funding it (employee portion of social security)? Both actions drive the programs deeper into debt.

How are things even staying afloat?
The answer is the government is now writing IOUs, selling them to the Chinese for face value, and telling them they may collect it with interest in the future...from our unborn children.
THIS IS TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION.

The following data comes from the back page of the 1040 instruction book for the past decade or so:

Percentage of Income derived from Income Taxes and Borrowing.
(Note that while the 1040 data separates income taxes from social security and medicare taxes, I lump them together in this table).

Year Taxes Borrowing
1999 82% 0%
2000 82% 0%
2001 85% 0%
2002 78% 8%
2003 70% 17%
2004 67% 18%
2005 70% 13%
2006 71% 9%
2007 75% 6%
2008 69% 15%
2009 51% 40%
2010 51% 37%
2011 53% 36%

The govt of the USA hasn't been known for compelling people to work in order to keep their income stream coming in.
Shrug all you want. The govt will simply sell more IOUs to the Chinese to make up for it.
At some point in time, the Chinese are going to come to collect on those IOUs.
Is it unreasonable to think that your children may be put into a labor camp?

Agree? Disagree? How does one fight against this?


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 5.
  • Posted by buybuydandavis 12 years, 2 months ago
    Get your assets out of dollars. And Tbills.

    Wait for the devaluation/default. The funny thing is we've already defaulted on dollars, which were promises to pay an amount of gold.

    Soon we'll be defaulting on promises (tbills) to give people promises we've already defaulted on (dollars).

    It's strange that the world can really run like this.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by captainkirk_19 12 years, 2 months ago
    ther's only one thing you can do when someone has won @ monopoly, all you can do is put it back in the box. The Government is corrupt, we know this, there is only one thing to do, put it back in the box. we all know the answer to shutting down the motor of the system, stop contributing, shrugg and walk away and say im leaving it the way i found it, good luck. you'll survive, they wont know what to do they wont be able to make because they only know how to take. so everyone stop beating around the bush, and do it all ready, stop the whining, and the lack of action, stop the motor allready. go to work and just sit there until your fired, then file for unemployment, and food stamps and welfare and social security and social security disability even if you know you dont qualify do it anyways because they will still have to process the paperwork it will not only stop the motor of their system it will sieze up so fast it catches fire! Then they will have no chioce but to stop and allow the Makers and Doers to restructure, rebuild, reorginize, because thats all they know how to do anyways is let someone else do it all for them, they just have to know they are not actually in control of it anymore, you have to make the system shrug.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Solitus 12 years, 2 months ago
    And what will the Chines collect? Abandoned homes, dirty cities, lazy undereducated slobs. Yeh, I'd collect on that pile of dung. Sovereign monetary process is not the same as kitchen table budgeting. Why? Because we can't print it.
    John Galt or Cloward-Piven gets the same result - the collapse of the cultural philosophies that got us in the pile of dung we sit in now.
    We do not have the possibility of unlimited growth, or unlimited resources; therefore Ayn's point of reference, as to human capability, is outdated.
    The answer? Get a sailboat and leave the US. Like me. I like Chile, a country where the students hold rallies to get their teachers to work more hours. And they have most of the lithium on this planet.
    And thanks for buying my blueberries.
    C'ya losers.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by UncommonSense 12 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The only thing that's good about Albuquerque is Rudy's BBQ. It wouldn't suprise me about Soros being in Brazil for a while. About 5 years ago, he invested nearly a billion dollars in one of their companies, who specialize in REALLY deep oil drilling.

    Remember the pathetic cover story the Left told the Americans the reason why the EPA is shutting down oil production in the Gulf? Because it's "too deep"? Well, sure, 5,000 feet down is deep, but it's pretty damn shallow when you compare it to Brazil's 17,000 feet just to reach the bottom to start drilling. Now, what was that about not drilling in the Gulf because it's "too deep"? Come again?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 12 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I thought Soros was hanging out in Brazil sucking up all that oil development money the US govt sent down there. having been in Idaho recently for a couple of weeks, I would say that it mostly is very conservative (with the exception of Sun Valley area). It seems to be doing well economically. commodities and extraction industries. there is alot of rural, back woods, off the beaten track places there and those citizens are VERY private. Here was my beef-cell towers. There aren't enough of them and so communication is limited in most of the state. that's my opinion on that.
    Colorado is completely destroyed. and really downhill since the mid 90s. do not go there. and NM? that state boils my blood everytime I go through there. one emerald city, and the rest of the state languishes. it reminds me of a fiefdom. Albuquerque thrives off of all crony businesses and govt stuff. and some of the most insane environmental/forest service regulatory BS I have ever seen anywhere except for CA
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by UncommonSense 12 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I believe one of his homes are in ID, not sure if it's his main residence. I swear Soros is the Emperor. Just Yahoo Image Soros and compare it to Star Wars Emperor Palpatine. There is no difference, other than the clothes.

    I got the Small Arms Marksmanship ribbon during my shooting with my gasmask on. Does that count?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by UncommonSense 12 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    DK, OK? It's in the middle of tornado alley, and also, just like Texas, frequently get Texas-sized hail that come down to give your car nice dimples ~ don't think I'll go there. Wyoming, yeah, I did that for 6 years...I'm not going to go back, too high and dry. Yes, beautiful and NO state income tax, but not for me. Montana's nice, but no jobs for me there. Idaho? Doesn't the Left's sugardaddy, George Soros live there? I know it's very beautiful there, but I don't think there's much in the way of employment is there? Utah? Nope, if you're not Mormon, you're a nobody, no thanks. I totally concur with NM and Colorado. Did you ever want to go back and see what 1967 looks like? (culturally that is), then head on up to Boulder, where 1967 will never die! Hold on, I'm gagging...ok.
    Damn. Texas huh? IDK yet. I'll wait and see for now.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 12 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Prepare to be shocked: I agree with you.

    I also think Mr Clinton got enormously lucky collecting tax receipts from equity yields during the dot-com bubble years.

    But I'm not taking anything away from you on this point. Bush 43 started something bad, and Obama hit the accelerator on it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by UncommonSense 12 years, 2 months ago
    At some point, numbers become meaningless. When we see people voting for Ovomit 5 or 6 times over, do you really believe that these people are concerned about tens of trillions of dollars in debt? To them, they're like 'What's a trillion? Oh well, I guess that's a big number...not my problem, hey, where's my free stuff?...'

    So the question is, if we really can't 'shrug' then where do we move to? The whole world is turning into one giant toilet bowl, thanks to the commies around the world and to the softy repubs like Senator McLame in AZ.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo