Idiot Feds Accused Convenience Stores Of Discriminating Against Minority Job Seekers By Refusing To Consider Applicants With Criminal Record - D.C. NIFO
Posted by freedomforall 1 week, 6 days ago to Government
Excerpt:
"A popular US convenience store chain has been hit with a civil rights lawsuit accusing it of discriminating against minority job seekers because it requires applicants to have no criminal record.
On April 18, the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced that it had filed a lawsuit against Sheetz Inc., accusing the 24/7 convenience store chain of having discriminatory hiring practices that targeted minority applicants.
According to the lawsuit, Sheetz has maintained a longstanding practice of screening all job applicants for records of criminal conviction and then denying them employment based on those records.
As a result, the EEOC is accusing Sheetz of “disproportionately screening out Black, Native American/Alaska Native and multiracial applicants.” This is despite the fact that the lawsuit does not allege that Sheetz’s hiring practices were motivated by race."
-------------------------------------------
Repeal the 1964 Civil Rights Act
D.C. Deep State is Power MAD and will never change. NIFO
"A popular US convenience store chain has been hit with a civil rights lawsuit accusing it of discriminating against minority job seekers because it requires applicants to have no criminal record.
On April 18, the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced that it had filed a lawsuit against Sheetz Inc., accusing the 24/7 convenience store chain of having discriminatory hiring practices that targeted minority applicants.
According to the lawsuit, Sheetz has maintained a longstanding practice of screening all job applicants for records of criminal conviction and then denying them employment based on those records.
As a result, the EEOC is accusing Sheetz of “disproportionately screening out Black, Native American/Alaska Native and multiracial applicants.” This is despite the fact that the lawsuit does not allege that Sheetz’s hiring practices were motivated by race."
-------------------------------------------
Repeal the 1964 Civil Rights Act
D.C. Deep State is Power MAD and will never change. NIFO
Are they implying refused applicants with criminal records are mostly minorities?
If so, doesn't a private company have the right to refuse criminals employment based on their criminal record? Minority or not?
Further, are they saying a private individual must
employ people with criminal records simply because they are minorities? That sounds racist to me.
Felons are felons, regardless of race.
If it happens that many felons are of minority status, so be it. You shouldn't be forced to employ persons of dubious character.
pushing up daisies.
exampled MUST be made
For example, suppose we are investigating r+cism in the Massachusetts town of Phluggborough. there are five members of the Board of Selectmen. Exactly 13% must be of that ethnic group. The exact mathematical method for accomplishing such an amount is left to the school mathematics department, from which all students now get a grade of A because anything else would be d+scriminatory. Piece of cake.
Oops, the Board of Selectmen is now called the Select Board because women cannot be included as men. Unless they underwent G+ender R+assignment.
Bag of cake!
D.C. NIFO to change that outcome.
It's the only way to be sure.
it may discriminate against those with criminal records
or is the EEOC saying that minorities are criminals?? that is the logical conclusion from their statement
they are saying ANYONE, regardless of skin color cannot have a criminal record
that is hardly racist if it applies to EVERYONE
it may be short-sighted
it may be clueless
it may be wrong
but it is not racist it applied across the board
BTW, in most if not all states after a certain amount of time with not issues, you can apply to have your record sealed and then say you have no criminal history.
And at this point why bother to check for a criminal record or ask for a photo ID. Excluding anyone because of "white privilege" is no longer that much of a stretch either.
"Here's your brand new AR-15 and ten boxes of ammunition, Mr. Mohammad Bomblastmani with your Death To America also on your T-Shirt."
Unfortunately, the feds make the irrational rules and don't apply them to themselves.
Barrett is a left-biased traitor and joins the 3 other leftist traitor Deep State whores.
With Deep State tool Roberts, it's a majority for the traitors.
But she is a good example of Trump's inability to choose appointees who won't backstab him. I was fooled by "The Apprentice."
When it comes to freedom compromise is for fools and slaves.
i do not understand what you are trying to say here