Uncle Sam admits monitoring you for these 377 words:

Posted by UncommonSense 10 years, 6 months ago to Government
23 comments | Share | Flag

This is an older story, but one I think may not have made it into the Gulch. FYI. 377 words the gubbermeant is watching out for. Feel safer yet? Don't forget: it's for the economy, the children, the 'little guy', the environment...any other excuse I left out?


All Comments

  • Posted by johnpe1 10 years, 6 months ago
    reminds me of George Carlin's seven words which you
    can't say on television -- we just don't say 'em! but,
    with these, a casual conversation about a Coastie
    friend might get you trapped. -- j

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ puzzlelady 10 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Clearly it is to collect information on people interested in those subjects... and all the people to whom they write. Build a net of connections to track all members of a conspiracy. Come to think of it, why is "conspiracy" not on the list?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ winterwind 10 years, 6 months ago
    kh, you're in trouble now. Your comments [complaints] about the lack of a certain substance on this list is clearly a sign that someone [a close relative, perhaps?] should keep a careful eye on you for suspicious activities. Such activities might include drinking ice water, having a nice iced margarita, or icing down that twisted ankle.
    tsk, tsk
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 10 years, 6 months ago
    A nice even number 2 * pi * 60 = 377, which crops up all the time in the parts of the world (most of the Americas) on 60 Hz power.

    I doubt the article b/c the words are so common as to flag almost any communication. They're not odd words like rare chemicals or names of weapons parts but rather everyday words that appear in every newspaper. If it's true, it's just a backdoor way of saying they monitor *everything*. The only way it could be any more general is if they added a, an, the, and all forms of "to be".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 2004done 10 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Your statement: "Your Privacy is also protected:" begs the comparison to other things that occur, but shouldn't. I hope you are correct with "reporting is limited to," but I don't believe the Constitution is being used very frequently in this era.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Stormi 10 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I used to do that, mentioning at least one of the trigger words Echelon checked for during Clinton, whenever I made a phone call. My friends did it also.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Owlsrayne 10 years, 6 months ago
    I use quite a number of those words here in the Gulch. All the scathing emails I send to the Congressional Senators and Representative I use a lot more of those words. I will continue to do so. I refuse to be politically correct. The Constitution is very important to me, infringing upon the freedom of speech by our own govt is insane. This scenario is paranoia run amok! I really pray to God that an asteroid would fall upon the NSA facility in Utah and make it one big hole in the ground!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LarryHeart 10 years, 6 months ago
    Sorry, you left out relevant facts. The search words used for "Items of Interest" (IOI) reporting is limited to:

    2.1 Incidents that Warrant an IOI
     Terrorist incidents (including foreign countries)
     Major natural disasters (e.g., floods, tornadoes, earthquakes)
     Transportation incidents where major bottlenecks may occur or chemical/explosive
    hazards exist
     Incidents that could result in injury to a local population (e.g., fire at a chemical
    production facility releasing toxic fumes)
     Incidents that result in damage to critical infrastructure
     Safety issues (e.g., aircraft emergency)
     Certain crimes (e.g., snipers, mall/school shootings, major drug busts, illegal
    immigrant busts, etc).
     Policy directives, debates, and implementations related to DHS

    So even though the list contains some regularly used words. unless they relate to the items above, they are ignored.

    Your Privacy is also protected:

    3 Personally Identifiable Information (PII) Guidance:
    PII refers to information that can be used to uniquely identify, contact, or locate a single person
    or can be used with other sources to uniquely identify a single individual. Before sending out
    ANY reports, including IOIs, ]\al33l analysts must ensure that if there is any PII included in a
    media article, that information must be removed, due to privacy issues! (Figure 6, IOI Example
    )
    Generally, both MMC and SN must never send out any IOIs with PII included except in
    “extremis situations”. An extremis situation occurs when there is an imminent threat of loss of
    life, serious bodily harm, or damage/destruction to critical facilities or equipment (in these
    circumstances, the appropriate DHS OPS authority must approve PII, in which case, TSI
    management would need to be made aware of the situation). Note: The DHS OPS authority
    includes OPS Senior Executive leadership and the SWO.
    The following are cases in which PII must be removed from all MMC reports:
    1) Names, positions, or other information that would enable someone to determine the
    identity of a particular person
    a. The Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) allows for certain exemptions in which PII
    may be included to identify spokesmen, government officials and reporters. Note:
    Refer to section 3.1 and the current PIA for more information
    2) Names of known or suspected terrorists, DTO leaders, or other individuals who are a
    threat to homeland security, regardless of whether a U.S. citizen or non-U.S. citizen
    3) Links to the actual articles or postings referenced provided the links themselves do not
    contain PII. In this case the analyst would use “No Link Due To PII” instead of the
    actual link.
    4) Addresses that would reveal where a person lives. In this case the analyst would either
    delete the street address completely generalize it to the street block. Example: instead of
    using “1345 John Doe Avenue”, the analyst could use “the 1300 block of John Doe
    Avenue”.
    Note: The MMC watch may provide the name, position, or other information considered to be
    PII to the NOC over the telephone when approved by the appropriate DHS OPS authority. But
    that information must not be stored in a database that could be searched by an individual’s PII.

    Read for yourself:
    http://epic.org/foia/epic-v-dhs-media-mo...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by RonC 10 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    If we all included those words in the header or footer of our messages snooping would soon become more trouble than it's worth. Imagine 300M people mailing 10-20 notes per day with the 377 word list included.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, taxpayers $$. If was the Establishment's $$ at risk, then there wouldn't be any monitoring going on at all.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Susanne 10 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Don't need people to do it - it's all done via various intercept programs automatically - if you hit a certain percentage srcore, then it gets forwarded to an analyst. Been that way for over a decade already.

    Sorry, but big brother set up shop while everyone was busy trying to decide whether to put a new flag on their car antenna or not.

    Can't close the barn door now, no more than you can on ebola after you send thousands to get infected and bring it back. (Oh yeah, that was an al queda plan - get a group infected with some nasty disease, and bring them back into airports. Why is our government following that plan??)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DaveM49 10 years, 6 months ago
    Hmm...Cut and paste the lot as a warning to others and encourage them to share....

    Wouldn't be a bad e-mail signature either.

    Let's see....did I use any of the "wrong" words in this post?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 6 months ago
    I find that I've used very few of those words. I'll have to do much more.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys1 10 years, 6 months ago
    remarkable that there are people who take the job of monitoring their fellow citizens. it must pay quite a bit to get people do actually do this.
    home of the brave and land of the free exists no more!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ rainman0720 10 years, 6 months ago
    I think that every email I send from this point forward will contain at least one of these words.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 10 years, 6 months ago
    If they are formally releasing the list, then (a) it isn't important, (b) it's disinformation/distraction, and/or (c) it's another method to intimidate innocent patriotic civilians.
    Real terrorists would be far too careful for this to matter.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ AJAshinoff 10 years, 6 months ago
    I think I'll FB every word it that list and challenge the bastards to come to investigate.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Snoogoo 10 years, 6 months ago
    Hah! There are so many loopholes around that, what a waste of time and MONEY.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo