If our Dear Leader does this, he is unquestionably a Dictator
I'd certainly like to hear from a Constitutional scholar as to whether the second amendment can be infringed to this degree.
| You type: | You see: |
|---|---|
| *italics* | italics |
| **bold** | bold |
While we're very happy to have you in the Gulch and appreciate your wanting to fully engage, some things in the Gulch (e.g. voting, links in comments) are a privilege, not a right. To get you up to speed as quickly as possible, we've provided two options for earning these privileges.
The country will survive. Individual liberty, with the bravery of sovereign people.
His democratic sycophants do whatever he wants. The republicans can't string a spine together to resist anything.
The O told congress they were irrelevant some time ago, and effectively he is correct.
The Republican congress were typical power hungry scoundrels and looters.
Obama is so much worse than Johnson there is absolutely no comparison. Johnson was a mediocre leader who was impeached by a power mad congress whose main policy was to justify the war by punishing southerners. The reconstruction period was looter heaven and the Republicans were the beneficiaries.
Obama is a traitor who thinks more of a foreign enemy than he does of the majority of the American people. There is no punishment too severe for Obama's acts.
that his administration was already plotting
his dictatorship re: martial law. God Save America....
O wants martial law before his term is out so he can retain power indefintely.
It could alternatively be a poor negotiating technique: pushing for more than you expect in order to get a better compromise position from spineless republicans.
Possibly also an attempt to distract attention and action from things like Obamacare that should be a high priority for repeal, not reform.