Which backs up the equation to influence coming from the only possible place - the polls and losing other support and that means targeting areas that are possible. 110,000 precincts and one third of the 25% of eligible to vote who do vote split between Dinos, Rinos and the small partys and independents and then go after those who were opting not to vote or not to register and not vote. Same ones the Dinos and Rinos go after. If they put the usual act it would nine percent to beat both of them assuming they split in a fairly even manner. OR 13 percent if they through off the maskirova of being a multiparty system and went for one or the other candidate. they hand select. Or they make a fool of themselves publically in the process.

First you need the actual numbers and they might be a closely guarded State Secret.

Then you need to know and that's local knowledge where to target and how to target.
I like hit and run and hit from another direction another way. Makes them chew up campaign funds fast. Soros and the money laundering congress don't know what to defend nor where nor when.

Third you need a focus point in effect if not a real party a straw party with an acceptable campaign for the sole purpose of defeating the other two candidates of the single party system in as many areas, precincts etc. as possible.

Then you become will of the wisp so the press doesn't know from one day to the next who or whom to attack.

It's not even close to time to do more while presenting the ideas

Any chance of infiltrating one or the other in the primary where enough people can cause a weak candidate to win and strong candidate to lose. That's called raiding in polysci terminolgy.

The whole thing is a death of a thousand cuts but the mosquitoes get blamed. Funny thing there are always more mosquitoes.

That one group of people which now seems to equal or more than equal either of the two halves of the government party is a mighty enticing group to go after.

Even the threat of doing so. What I'm writing right now will cause a realignment of campaign funds.

Drop by drop the same way the bleed us.

I would suggest a few word changes. You live in a portion of California that is overwhelmingly Government Party. Then define proportional representation. Is that something like so many Democrats so many Republicans totaling so many Government Party candidates elected?

In any case it sounds like bi-partisanship or cross-partisanship two other terms for a single party system of government so I have to find out what it might really be.

The point of the suggestion which was offered as a way to cure soft money from where ever is to get rid of any donating or volunteering entity that has no business in any specific voting district - be it state, county, city, federal or other district, township or any other special district such as those dealing with water use. The key point is only people in that district as set down in the precinct voting system or booklet who are able to vote in that precinct have any business trying to sway the vote in that precinct one way or the other. The answer to your problem of not enough conservatives or any other stripe is not solved by working for them elsewhere but enabling them a fighting chance of establishing themselves in your precinct. That they aren't going to be able to accomplish with the likes of non-voting entities getting in the way. Such as all corporations or companies, political machines from other states, other countries, union and other PACs none of which can vote.

The playing field is leveled to contain you and your neighbors. You aren't fighting George Soros or General Motors. As one moves through the voting handbook and the ballot the stage enlarges automatically until the final step that of President and Vice-President. Presently that is confined to two candidates for each from the Government Party. The guy or gal you really wanted is out in the cold. Same with measures and speaking of which if you don't have them add Recall, Initiative, Whatever amount of funding is allowed for each local registered voter for each candidate or measure. Those sorts of follow on or lead the way clean up the ballot tools. The list is incomplete but it's a start. If you or it can't vote it can't participate. As far as those other districts are concerned they aren't your business unless you move. Works in two directions. And don't forget students., If they register to vote locally make sure they are on the tax and jury selection rolls as well.

Notice this does not encourage any particular party nor even only two party's but a way of getting away from a monolithic single party system and go to a new idea - more than one party or even as our Government Party has become a Political Coalition'

Best of all you still have the right of free assembly and free speech. It's dollars, volunteer time and sign painters, tv and radio advertising time that are the targets.

Now think about how to control that last group. I'm worn out from gun control which usually only recites a few old saws and ends up hammering away at not much. Anchor threads in the sailing community are much like that.

It's not a case of being allowed or not allowed., It's a case of looking in the mirror and being proud of what you did or afraid to admit what you did to your children.. No one else to praise. No one else to blame.