Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by woodlema 10 years, 9 months ago
    It is a thing called "Path of least resistance."

    Ground varies in hardness and consistency and water will flow to the lowest point and carve the softest ground. When water crests due to flooding, water will flow to the lowest point, causing gouges in the ground making a channel/path to flow...pretty much common sense.

    BUT here is a question.

    What three rivers in the world flow North?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 10 years, 9 months ago
    Who needs muskrats? The first pebble that falls into the stream (or the first dead animal that blocks a bit of flow near the bank) will start the same chain of events.

    And why not beavers? Because they don't tend to build their homes anywhere near slow-moving streams or rivers... they CREATE the slow-moving waters with their dams.

    How do they know where to put their dams to make the pent-up mini-lake behind their dam? Some time back I read about the answer: Beavers begin to block a stream where it's NOISIEST... where it's tumbling downhill the steepest. Building a dam there will tend to create a nice little lake upstream and it's certainly easier for a beaver to find the noisiest part of a stream than to figure out any other prime location.

    Notice how even humans put dams across steep, fast-moving rivers... you won't find many hydroelectric power centers on the Mississippi, for example.. :)

    Loved my 10th-grade Earth Science class... 1960-1961.

    Cheers!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by philosophercat 10 years, 9 months ago
      Beavers are very smart and only build where there is food. that is not on steep banks and narrow fast moving streams. they build where there are easy to ascend bankings and lots of young woody material along the shore. Calm waters are easy to swim in both directions. I have been involved with beavers in various locations from Maine to Montana and Washington. They like a stream that can be damned and provide food then abandoned and move to a new site while the vegetation returns to the old site. I'll save the story of how beavers drown Coyotes for another time.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by plusaf 10 years, 9 months ago
        Well, maybe that was an old married beaver's tale...
        :)
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by philosophercat 10 years, 9 months ago
          Well slap my tale. the noisy part is they detect the differential motion of water with their whiskers to find leaks in the dam and plug them. They have to be on the calm side to feel the very subtle flows differentials. Its fascinating to go to their dens in winter and see the little hole where the warm air from the den escapes. There are usually tracks of Bobcats, coyotes, and fox leading to the small breathing hole where they can sniff but not reach. The longest dam I have dealt with was a half mile long and backed water up through a small forest which was fun to paddle it.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by woodlema 10 years, 9 months ago
      They could have if they had the forethought.

      http://www.midwestenergynews.com/2011/06...

      Only around 2,000 of the nation’s 79,000 dams are equipped with generators, leaving a great deal of potential on the table, say hydropower advocates. Most of the locks and dams offer “low head” hydropower where the differential between the height of river before and after the dam is 30 feet or less. They are sometimes called “run of the river” power plants because they do not stop flows or create pooling upstream.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by plusaf 10 years, 9 months ago
        Wood, I've wondered about that, too. I live near a man-made lake which has a frequent overflow. My suspicion is that most such potential energy sources aren't economical because of the investments and resources needed to build, connect and maintain such energy supplies.

        Many are near potential consumers but the ancillary infrastructure to tie them into even a substation grid and protect them and the grid from each other just might price them out of the potential market for a while... or forever.

        Having something 'available' doesn't mean anyone might be willing to 'buy it at the market price.'

        But hey, I'm just a guy with engineering and marketing background... what do _I_ know? Let's leave those tough decisions up to local and state Legislatures, right?
        :)
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Radio_Randy 10 years, 9 months ago
      Ahhh...the "Butterfly Effect".
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by plusaf 10 years, 9 months ago
        Ah, maybe, Randy, but I wouldn't jump to that one.
        Tracing the effects from a butterfly's wing-flap to a major storm sounds pretty tough, but a good-sized pebble in a stream can have immediate and 'somewhat predictable' or at least traceable effects.

        The 'butterfly effect' is cute, but with so many butterflies (and moths and such) in the world, I'd put its Predictive Value at somewhere VERY close to Zero, (if not lower.) :)
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo