The Fountainhead
We found "The Fountainhead" on iTunes and watched it last night. Wow (Long Pause for Effect) what a movie. This sure took a chapter out of my working life only I never had the enjoyment of blowing anything up after someone defaced my work or stole the credit. Did Ayn Rand ever have an ability to clearly see reality for what it was.
But the background music on a LOT of all-English (American-English)-speaking shows does the same thing.
It's as if nobody ever takes 'one last listen' before saying "Print!"... or whatever they say now... :)
On the third hand, I HATE IT when the 'background music' becomes Foreground Music and isn't faded down when the actors begin to speak.
Producers or directors might think it's just SO cool or 'mood-setting,' but it just makes it impossible to hear a lot of the dialogue.
Excellent, Grasshopper! You Are Aware!
:)
Two different art forms - two different narrative conventions must be maintained.
I say this because that is exactly what Anthem provided me as a pre-teenager. And gee, without government mandated counselors.
I was very young and looking for a verification of what I was so early formulating as a framework of thought that could provide an operable basis for life.
Anthem, and the other major pieces of Ayn Rand's work - and the experiences of sitting alone on my ten-speed on the Concord Bridge in Massachusetts are intensely integral to my life.
I sat there on Concord Bridge trying to understand why certain people would resist significant and apparently overwhelming forces at the risk of their very lives.
I directly struggled with the immediately evident understanding that these individuals chose to possibly- and likely - die as a result of "resisting the king" than to live with a life arbitrarily determined by others than themselves.
What "belief system" is worth more than life itself if it comes down to it? This is a huge visceral question for which many have given their lives as the very testimonial answer to the question.
It is the "how did they know" question that haunts me the most about when it comes time to expend your utmost - as an individual - in the name of that freedom - and give it all.
I always thought it was to accommodate the loud volumes one experiences when in a movie theater, but that doesn't make sense given the much longer history of movies in the movie theaters. Or, have they cranked up the volume in our "modern" era? But also, the network series productions are guilty of this as well. So it isn't just a theater thing.
I think it is the fault of the sound engineers. Notice that when the kissing/slurping/chew face thing has to happen it is quite loud, but when some dialogue occurs you can hardly hear it.
Many a production is guilty of this, and it should not attributed to certain performers. But I find Russel Crowe really guilty of this. I could hardly sit through the remake of 3:10 to Yuma because of this. Imagine that - having to turn on subtitles on an English speaking film so that you can follow the dialogue. Jeez.
Something which helped me was studying the research of Geert Hofstede, who came up with the idea of "cultural dimensions" - stereotypes which are supported by evidence. The main dimensions are Power Distance, Individualism, Uncertainty avoidance, Masculinity, and Long Term Orientation.
Where that applies in this discussion is with individuality, a dimension in which countries like the USA scores highest in the world. Other countries, such as South Korea and Saudi Arabia, score very low.
http://geert-hofstede.com/united-states....
Lecturers like your daughter had would be better off in one of these other countries.
Said "Yep, I want to see that."
Went straight to Netflix but found it is glitching any movie I try to write in to order right now.
I will get around to seeing that flick soon one way or the other.
Thanks.
how did Roark sacrifice his integrity?
If Roark is like a diety to you, I think you've missed some important concepts in the book, sunjock. So I assume you mean this in hyperbole :)
Load more comments...