Ben Carson on CNN: Topic Planned Parenthood
I do really appreciate this man temperament and intelligence. This country can do far worse than this level headed, intelligent man for its next President.
While we're very happy to have you in the Gulch and appreciate your wanting to fully engage, some things in the Gulch (e.g. voting, links in comments) are a privilege, not a right. To get you up to speed as quickly as possible, we've provided two options for earning these privileges.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 5.
When it comes to voting we only have a choice between two candidates between which we can either identify a difference still worth having compared to the worst of them, or not find a difference worth it all. Voting in such circumstances is not a compromise. The situation is forced on us.
Carson does have integrity -- for his own values, but when a "steely spine" is defending destruction through the wrong values it is not good. For all his admirable achievements he does not understand philosophy and much of the political situation.
inˈfan(t)əˌsīd/
noun
1.the crime of killing a child within a year of birth.
2.a person who kills an infant, especially their own child
The only thing that doesn't make it a crime is the letter of the law. "Anti-Rand"...another one.
Yes, it was me on a t least of few of your more vitriolic and accusatory statements.
I consider a clump of cells from two human beings that have bound together to begin the formative stage of human development to be the start of life. You don't mix human sperm and human ego and ever get a duck.
There are more than enough birth control options before, during, and after intercourse to rid the world of abortion except in the case of the mothers life at risk. To use abortion as birth control, today, with what we have available, is irresponsible, sinister, and completely opposite of individual accountability.
1930s Sanger rhetoric on eugenics has nothing to do with the right of abortion. You know very well that this is a matter of individual rights, not eugencis. This has been refuted previously and your continued smears as an excuse to shut down abortion are dishonest and disgusting.
The "cronyist empire" is the result of statist and collectivist philosophy making the corruption possible. The demolition begins with demolishing the statist ideology they live off. Very little can be done by going after the corruption itself. Some of it can be sometimes be derailed, but only temporarily in an otherwise zigzagging net downward spiral. But we do what we can.
Going after Planned Parenthood isn't even primarily a matter of corrupt cronyism. They are primarily cashing in on welfare statism. Shifting their funding in a hysterical attack on abortion is worse than a useless rearranging the deck chairs.
Do you define a child as a clump of cells? Or as a fully (or very nearly) fully-formed human being?
Logically, unless a fetus is capable of survival outside the womb, how can it be given human status? Please note that approximately 35% of pregnancies end in spontaneous abortion. Could that possibly be the "will" of "Nature"?
If the assertion holds that consciousness is not present until some arbitrary point along that developmental path, it is up to you to prove when that "magic" moment happens. So far, even the best science has to offer can neither measure, detect, nor quantify consciousness. Even Rand declared it as a tautology: consciousness is. Without that ability to measure and define there is no way to objectively ascertain the reality of the matter. All we can do is view some of the outcomes of consciousness - but the very essence of consciousness is beyond our understanding. As such, it should be treated with the utmost care and respect, not blatantly ignored on a whim or justified due to inconvenience.
Is the goal to shut down Planned Parenthood as an abortion provider? Absolutely. If you want to decry some hidden agenda, go decry Margaret Sanger - the Founder - and her eugenicist policies! Go decry her open statements praising Hitler and the Ku Klux Klan! Go decry her open statements admitting that her goal was to eradicate blacks! Go decry her goals to see that every baby ever born was subject first to approval by the Federal government!
Again - if you haven't watched the videos, go do it. Until you have, you have no more standing in this conversation.
The real question is why one would support the infanticide of 40 million Americans and all of the productivity they could have given.
At what place do you think that the demolition of the cronyist empire should begin?
Have you ever even watched the videos? If you have not, I urge you to do so - if you can stomach them. The fact that they are revolting and repugnant should be a direct clue as to their morality.
Rand similarly ignores that the choice is not whether or not to abort, but whether or not to engage in sex. It is at THAT moment that any potential pregnancy arises - not the choice whether or not to abort the baby. The argument for abortion is a deflection from the true cause and effect.
The serious flaw in Piekoff's argument centers around "potentiality". If one arbitrarily asserts that life only acquires value according to certain criteria - that life is not intrinsically valuable - one has directly affirmed a slippery slope as one's basis for determining consciousness and rights. The problem with such is that it can be used as justification for eugenics, racial cleansing, or the killing of those with deformities just as easily as it can be used as justification for abortion. Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood) brought this up and openly praised Adolf Hitler for his program of eugenics. She, too, made no attempt to hide the fact that she strictly favored the government control of all births according to their "suitability" - a subjective measurement if there ever was one. The assertion by both Rand and Piekoff is that somehow they claim the moral authority to ascertain the utility of life - a bold statement indeed given the fact that they have no control over death other than to administer it to others!
The morass of subsidies of all kinds is a result of the usual pressure group warfare and will not be eliminated by "getting" Planned Parenthood. But ending subsidies isn't the point of this.
At what place do you think that the demolition of the cronyist empire should begin? If not, are you going to wait for the collapse as those in AS did? When John and Dagny went back to the world after the collapse, do you not think that looters would pop up again like so many dandelions?
Planned Parenthood had revenues of $1.3 billion, of which > $500 million came from taxpayers in their 2013-2014 annual report. They had > 300,000 abortions (330,000 in their 2008-2009 report). Elsewhere, I found that as of 2008/2009, the average cost of an abortion is nominally $450-500. Hence, we are talking about approximately $150 million in abortion procedures annually. PP states that 3% of their procedures are abortions. That probably is correct. Nominally 12% of their revenue is from abortions, according to my rough calculations. It certainly is not very far off.
Now look near the bottom line. PP had $127.1 million of "excess of revenue over expenses", meaning that we all paid so that PP could take $500+ million from each of us and declare a $127 million profit.
http://plannedparenthood.org/files/67...
Getting rid of corporate welfare is something that should be an easy thing to get people to agree upon. It is not, because most people have their own benefits from the crony empires that keep them in support of the cronyists.
If you want to abort as many fetuses as you and your significant other can procreate, go right ahead, but do not use my money or expect my endorsement.
Load more comments...