13

What the Hell America? Study Shows More Americans than Ever Support Banning Books

Posted by Zenphamy 8 years, 9 months ago to Philosophy
76 comments | Share | Flag

From the Article: "According to a recently released Harris Poll survey, the number of Americans who would support the banning of books has doubled between the years of 2011 and 2015.

28% of the 2,244 U.S. adults surveyed answered yes to the question “Do you think that there are any books which should be banned completely?” This same question was answered yes just 18% of the time back in 2011 when the survey was taken last.

“While it’s still a minority perception … I felt that from 18 to 28 percent in just four years was a rather surprising growth,” Harris Poll Research Manager Larry Shannon-Missal told Library Journal.

Some of the questions were relating to what children should be able to read in school, while others asked which books should be taken off the marketplace entirely.

What was also interesting about the study was the fact that 71% of those surveyed, even those who did not support the banning of books, were open to books being rated in a way similar to movies. Also, it seemed that many people wanted to ban books that were controversial and opposed their religious beliefs. Some of those surveyed wanted to ban the Bible, while others wanted the Koran banned, others wanted any books banned that supported the ideas of creationism, and still others wanted to ban atheist texts."
-------------------------------------------
What the Hell is Right. Satan's Crispy Balls
Religious belief systems keep screwing with freedom and liberty.


All Comments

  • Posted by $ jlc 8 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I like that. Good for you! Too many people think that the correct answer is still 'to leave it all up to the doctor'. There is no excuse for that in the internet age.

    Jan
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 8 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Nobody does, anyway. Haha...

    I'm a geek. A dweeb. Yesterday I had a short conversation with my dermatologist as he was carving on me. He said something like, "We don't know what causes that (unrelated medical condition)." To which I replied, "Not that I'm counting but there are 86 studies showing a link. There are far fewer saying there isn't one." The look he gave me should have been photographed and framed. LOL. I explained to a coworker the other day. "Don't worry. I'm just another Cliff Clavin." (anybody remember that character...a bunch of strange, trivial knowledge...)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Of 5 of us boys, the youngest was given a program named "Johnny can Read". He's the only one of us that hated reading.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Flootus5 8 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Will do. So far I am impressed. But I was also impressed by Peikoff''s "Ominous Parallels".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Flootus5 8 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I hadn't heard about "Johnny Can Read". Now I wonder if Leonard chose that title deliberately. Early on, he has debunked the replacement of phonetics in reading because it also undermines the teaching of thinking. Interesting.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Snoogoo 8 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    My point is that these studies are based on public opinion polls with too many variables. All it tells us is that in a given sample, there is a large percentage of people who lack basic independent and critical thinking skills. I don't think we need a study to prove that. I can walk out my front door and prove that...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Turfprint 8 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Answering the "why" of young children about sexist issues requires each teacher to have a lawyer present during the children's questioning. And they do question, you can believe that. But as any modern teacher is aware and who can answer from Marathon to Waterloo,
    In order categorical and knows the kings of England, and can quote the fights historical;
    "Just ask the government what to do!"
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 8 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hello superfluities,
    It is another classic, that seems all too relevant today. I don't think today's youth are being exposed, as many of us were, to the books and ideas that were important warnings of potential political tides.
    Apparently too many don't even want to read anything but facebook... Shame.
    Respectfully,
    O.A.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jnnrd54 8 years, 9 months ago
    As Lenin pointed out, useful idiots are necessary to achieve the marxist goals.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I hope that 's not similar to the "Johnny Can Read" program of the early 60's. That was the first strong attempt to replace phonetics and only my youngest brother (of 5) was exposed to that idiocy and never liked to read.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by BenFrank 8 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thank you for your insight Zenphamy. I will share this with my wife. It certainly won't make her feel any better but may assist her by simply being more informed of the source.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Flootus5 8 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    This is probably one of the most important studies and probably the one with the least funding.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Political Correctness, although i fully appreciate attorneys' contributions, is an off-shoot of Psychology's Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (semantic thinking, also a branch of 'brainwashing techniques' developed during those times) of the late 50's and 60's which correlates with several other works related to nurture vs nature thinking about personality developments even including the famous "Power of Positive Thinking". PC is just a larger scale method of such control and manipulation techniques.

    Cause and effect.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by BenFrank 8 years, 9 months ago
    This was was really interesting. Thank you for sharing the link and the article. I have to admit I am more disappointed than shocked. Political correctness is censoring us at every level and much of that began due to attorneys and corporations. My wife works in the corporate world and swears that if there is a way to remove every adjective from the English language it will be a corporate attorney who finds it. Since we are being constantly pilloried to fall in line with the most popular group think of the moment why would book banning be far behind? Besides, haven't you heard? No one reads books any more so who will it affect?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Snoogoo 8 years, 9 months ago
    According to a more recent study, there are too many useless studies.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 8 years, 9 months ago
    Ok, here is a thought to promote, it's one of the main tenants of my book and my philosophy.

    There is value in all things good, bad and dare I say, ugly; if only to recognize that which is not valuable.

    There is always something to learn, some puzzle piece to find or a clue to another.

    That's why no book, even if it's crap and full of lies or stupid ideas...there is something to learn.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 8 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I would expect the management are more in favor of banning ideas than anyone else on campus; the faculty somewhat less, and the students least. But of course there's enough existing censorship that the objectors don't dare speak up, unless they have tenure.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo