What does one have to do with the other. If you had said postjudiced politophobic THAT would have nailed it.

As for the perSON or perSONS who would say that I would consider that a self-descriptive phrase uttered for unfathomable reasons or maybe reason didn't enter the process.

My use of sexist terminology in the preceding paragraph either means I am sexist or I am poking fun at those who are sexist knowingly or unknowingly. One cannot assume with insufficient information. One can however ask.

President Barak Obama is a politician. All politicians lie. Therefore anything he says cannot be trusted as the truth but taken with at least a very large grain of salt or at the most as a falsehood.

Not my problem they brought it on themselves. Politicians in general and Attorney specifically.

After all they are lawyers. Lawyers in the role of defense attorney are trained that way. Those writing contracts much the same. Those uttering a false statement ( a term also meaning to write) when writing a law are more often than not breaking their oath of office. Ergo Sum Ad Nauseum Infinitum and Caveat Emptor to you! It's a circular argument thus the reason for Judges. BUT they are for the most part lawyers too are they not?

Thus shall it ever be

Now what was the original complaint?

Why would I believe such an accomplished liar?