What's our greatest threat?
Imagine two guys at a 4th of July picnic, after imbibing a bit too much, and laughing too much, the conversation gets serious. The guys names are Hector and Dewey, and here's an edited version of their conversation:
Hector asks, "What is the greatest threat facing the United States today? Dewey replies, "As I see it, there are three. One radical Islam, two the Chinese, three those knuckleheads in congress." Hector says, "Wrong, not even close. Here's the answer. The gravest threat facing the United States comes from within, when our best people refuse to get involved. When the men and women we need to fight those threats you mentioned -- radical Islam -- China, stay on the sidelines. That's our greatest threat."
Excerpted from "The Refuge" by Ben Coes.
So...what does the Gulch think? What is the U.S.'s greatest threat?
Hector asks, "What is the greatest threat facing the United States today? Dewey replies, "As I see it, there are three. One radical Islam, two the Chinese, three those knuckleheads in congress." Hector says, "Wrong, not even close. Here's the answer. The gravest threat facing the United States comes from within, when our best people refuse to get involved. When the men and women we need to fight those threats you mentioned -- radical Islam -- China, stay on the sidelines. That's our greatest threat."
Excerpted from "The Refuge" by Ben Coes.
So...what does the Gulch think? What is the U.S.'s greatest threat?
Attitude is important, YES, but do you see ANY signals that 'the public' is ANYWHERE NEAR changing their mind about the increasing 'need' for government controls? F'revvin' Sakes, there's a Socialist running under the Democratic banner!
I don't think we're anywhere near being Anywhere Near that 'terminal phase' yet... Do you?
That goes beyond evil into the realm of stupid.
I do not consider him a serious candidate, and I do not think anyone with an interest in reclaiming Constitutional governance and individual liberty should consider him a serious candidate either.
But that's an entirely different topic.
.
Look at what is being achieved by the fossil fuels industry by the INSPIRING work of the Center for Industrial Progress.
Was it the battle of Lexington when Americans fought the British with unconventional tactics?
The British forces were too strong to take on directly, but we're worn down over time.
Have scouts observe what the opposition, reality obfuscating lefties, have wrought and reverse engineering of their pathetic scheme.
Attitude is important, you need to find those silent suffering individuals and their family and remind them that the gathering storm clouds will disperse and the sun will shine once again.
12, 24, 36, 48.
So mentioning 28 times in 12 minutes is ~25 seconds between mentions.
Donald seems willing to mention issues that the others are afraid of.
He, at first, didn't believe me, but after a short google, discovered that the average approval rating, from multiple sources, was in the 10-15% range and the re-election rate was close to 95%.
So, I asked him... "what does that tell you?"
I suggested that the answer to the proverbial question of "what's wrong with Congress" really should be redirected as "What Wrong With The Electorate?"
Next challenge... exposing him to non-left-wing Economics.
:)
His assessment is doubly discouraging, and I think it's true: "We're arguably beyond the point of no return," I think is how he put it. That was in 1982, well before the whole toxic infusion of "PC" thought-policing and what it's done to an already-degraded condition in American education, so it's gotten much worse since.
The reason we have Obama in office, the reason we have a Congressload of unprincipled buffoons (they too went to school at some point - well, presumably,) the reason we're on the threshold of American cities getting incinerated by Iranian nukes, the reason we've got a burgeoning electronic revolution whose obliteration of the right to personal privacy is vastly outpacing its legitimate, positive aspects - is because we have multiple generations of people, arguably approaching a majority, who are educated in unmitigated intellectual poison.
It's a comparatively non-sexy issue, but a top priority of the incoming Republican President should be an aggressive, radical separation of government from education. Which means that this person will have to be someone of extraordinary courage, someone utterly unfazed by momentary tsunamis of opposition. And of course, this person would have to be capable of recognizing that this is a key danger to begin with. 'Not so sure such a person exists, but maybe we can train one.
I must admit that I actually feel heartbreak over what I see happening out here in California, in terms of the destruction of freedom. But, it's starting to sprout in other states...like mushrooms on my lawn in the winter...
Term limits - ultimately - are one group of people telling another group of people "you can't be trusted to decide for yourself who you want representing you."
What we need is to elect people who don't plan to stick around (I'm thinking for instance of NY Congressman Chris Gibson, who always said "I'm going to be in Congress, at most, X terms" (I can't remember how many it was) and a few days after his Xth term started, he announced he would not seek re-election)
Load more comments...