I think the biggest threat would be the anthropogenic complete nuclear explosion of the entire universe. Of the threats likely to happen, global mass murders by the Islamo fascists is more serious than that or other climate hysteria.

The recent coordinated mass murders in Paris were not caused by a Pam Geller video. Those affected by the savagery don't agree that ISIS "can't do much", but watch our for those fascist cars operating with AI to take over over the world. Destroying the fascists (including ISIS) is not "over reacting". The savages at war with the civilized world would be less of a threat if the leaders of the civilized world cared about destroying them instead of pandering to political correctness and treating "veterans and the tea party" as a "threat to the homeland". Normal people don't regard any of it as "laughable".

My old shitsu/poodle is too.

I will be shocked if they kill as many people as any other significant reason for murder or even as many as accidents. They wish they were a real threat. Some of the people they threaten wish they were a real threat. I don't think think any of them will get their wish.

You tell 'em, kid!!

To which I add Einstein's very insightful "the
difference between stupidity and genius is that
genius has limits" -

Herb, I don't believe I've ever told you this, but I always appreciate your humorous references!

What a great bumper sticker that would make! :)

Fivedollargold recommends that Bernie go to Syria and meet with ISIS to explain to them why burning coal in Illinois is the reason they feel the need to lop off people's heads. (He might also wear a Star of David to the meeting and bring along Madonna, clad in a skimpy outfit, to sing kumbaya.)

There's nothing wrong with ISIS that carpet bombing with B-52's can't fix.

A response worthy of Goethe and possibly the Bard.

LOL.

My Golden Retriever is smarter than Bernie Sanders.

ISIS can't do much until it is your family member that is killed. You will then sing a different tune.,

...and don't forget that just hours before the attacks in Paris, our Dear Leader deemed ISIS as "contained". The French no doubt have a different perspective on that.

I agree completely on the climate but not on ISIS. Even if you are correct that they are small in number, which I personally don't believe, we do not have an administration willing to do anything if needed. Seems to me Obama called them the JV team and they now own Iraq.

ISISs' answer to climate change...kill all the Infidels which will reduce the CO2 output.
Bernie should be backing them!

To YNGH:
I often use an old Red Skelton comment: "There is a limit to intelligence, but no limit to stupidity."

He's lying. They're all lying.

"I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to the data series...from 1981 onwards, and to 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline." That sentence told me everything I needed to know about global warming.

That gives new meaning to the term fossil fuel.

Typical response to a rather simple question about his yes or no opinion: 80% sounds reasonable on the surface, 20% pure blah, blah BS.
2+2=4+x=9, where x equals 2.

Human induced climate change is pure crap. Period. Climate change induced primarily by the SUN is a fact. Any attempt to slow down or stop climate change is foolishness of biblical proportions. ISIS is a pimple on an elephant's behind; all that's needed is a good swat. Just wipe them out. We did it to the Germans and Japanese, who both were much more formidable foes than a bunch of illiterate barbarians. Neither "problem" is a problem.