Head of virtual currency exchange found dead in Singapore
Posted by richrobinson 11 years, 6 months ago to The Gulch: General
I wonder what is going on???
SOURCE URL: http://www.cnbc.com/id/101468694
You type: | You see: |
---|---|
*italics* | italics |
**bold** | bold |
While we're very happy to have you in the Gulch and appreciate your wanting to fully engage, some things in the Gulch (e.g. voting, links in comments) are a privilege, not a right. To get you up to speed as quickly as possible, we've provided two options for earning these privileges.
Suicide, contract murder, or natural causes. I'm open to taking bets.
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_2...
I don't think it was. If you think US fiat currency is vulnerable, BC was much more vulnerable.
If the power went out around the world tomorrow, your dollar would still physically exist. BC's are gone until the power is restored.
I know we've discussed the value of gold over dollars in a SHTF scenario, but either one of those, is more valuable than a BC.
In a collapse situation, tangible assets would be the only store of value: food, guns, medical supplies, silver, gold and other precious metals, tools, petro, seeds, and a big roll of 'Federal Reserve Notes' packed in with the Charmin. Then of course, the most valuable non-tangible asset one would want is a sharp mind.
It only virtually exists, while paper money virtually has value (or no value depending on how you look at it). True, if the power is out, you're not getting money out of an ATM, but dollars in the pocket are better than BC's in a eWallet.
Paper money value doesn't fluctuate much day-to-day, month-to-month. BC does.
In a stable, free world, I think BC could work.
If the markets, and dollars all collapsed, I'm not sure you could exchange BC for gold at that point. I have a love/hate relation with BC. I have trust issues :-)
Gold preserves wealth. And will restore commerce in a SHTF scenario aftermath.
BC can only restore commerce if computers are brought back online, and merchants can trade in them electronically.
On a scale of 1- 10, 10 being untrackable, where to you put "easily" that allows you to sleep at night? :-)
Or, determine your political leaning by what Pandora tunes you listen to.
I question the security of the transactions of Bitcoin. I'll accept that the wallets are secure, but, I think the transactions are discoverable. If they weren't, I doubt highly the US gov, or others would allow BC to continue to exist. Excluding the current suicide as evidence that they don't want it to exist.
Ya know (and some here will disagree with this) I've always felt something is awfully fishy about the whole Bitcoin thing... never bought into it, as it never seemed tangiable. After the past few weeks, I can't say I'm sorry for missing out on this new "financial miracle".
(See: http://www.cnbc.com/id/101463888)
Correct. Fluctuations in currency values do not create or destroy value. All the value is in the goods and services we provide for each other. The medium of exchange is not very important.
I understand your allusion to open-market operations, but I don't get where you're going with it. I think you're against the gov't having such a large deficit; I am too. Even if we had a surplus, though, I'd support free-market operations with outstanding Treasuries.
The "no incentive left for us to work" because you think monetary policy is too loose is either hyperbole or melodrama. Lots of people go out and serve other people in exchange for dollars, pesos, pounds, euros, etc, and they do an amazing job and turn that money into factories, web services, and buildings that act as a space for more value creation. The fact that it now takes 20 Mexican pesos to buy a pound instead of 5, as it did 20 years ago, does not stop people from using pesos as a medium of exchange. All the value is in serving one another's needs in fair exchanges.
The "no incentive left for us to work" has more to do with out taxation system which is tied to our monetary system. To me it is simply, the harder someone works the more they lose through progressive taxation to pay for the poor money management of our government.
I appreciate the conversation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QTtXqDjN...
Jan