NY Times slurs 2nd Amendment

Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 8 months ago to News
41 comments | Share | Flag

this just gets my goat. . these people use every excuse
to dis-arm the good guys. . What Are They Smoking??? -- j
.

All Comments

Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 8 months ago
    They smoke different things. The "useful idiots" and the true believers are the lotus eaters of the agenda. The believe the "Sky is Falling" from Chicken Little and they must do whatever they can to prevent it, and they think that the only way to do it is by eliminating all guns. They are blind and never take into account that miscreants, whether criminals or Jihadists will have no trouble having guns and using them on the unarmed citizens. Then there are the puppet masters. They know that an unarmed populace is easier to control. It's as easy as that. That and control of the food supply are most likely the easiest way to become the first Emperor of America.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 8 months ago
    Thinking of a backup gun for my pocket pistol, I am currently reviewing derringers sold by a mail order company.
    These derringers shoot assorted projectiles, including "snake shot."
    So I'm also thinking that snake shot may be appropriate for socialist gun grabbers.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by radical 9 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Some years ago the Australians turned in their guns - to be destroyed in a machine shop. If ISIS conquers them, they will have deserved it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 8 months ago
    The one solace I have is that the only people who still read the NY Times are those picking apart their pathetic articles. If they just ignored them, they'd descend into the rubbish heap of obscurity just like every other left-wing newspaper.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by radical 9 years, 8 months ago
    I am already on the "no fly list." I keep a can of fly spray handy and when a fly appears I aim carefully and shoot down the fly. This is good practice for when a progressive or other communist tries to take my guns the spray can will change into a firearm and he or she can join the dead fly on the floor.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wmiranda 9 years, 8 months ago
    It seems the writer is more outraged at the fact the islamic terrorist bought guns in a store rather that being outraged for the killing itself. Paris was under gun control. Was he outraged there too?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 9 years, 8 months ago
    Police dont prevent attacks on my freedom. They arrive after the attack has occurred. If we want to protect ourselves FROM the attacks, we have to do it individually and if that means I need to carry a gun, so be it. Government has shown it is powerless to protect me from terrorism.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by GaryL 9 years, 8 months ago
    I love this statement, "weapons designed to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency.”

    Lets check this out, first we had rocks, then spears and then spears with rocks for points progressing to the bow and arrow and right up until today. Every weapon from the beginning has been designed to kill with brutal speed and efficiency or we would still be throwing rocks. Actually, a common punishment in the Islamic world is exactly that, "Stoning" and I would be happy to cast the very first rocks when they put the NY T in the pit with all the little trolls that write these ridiculous editorials.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Temlakos 9 years, 8 months ago
    The Times just plain lost it. Now they don't even pretend to be objective observers.

    They have as much as said: no person, except a law-enforcement officer, an active-duty military service member, or the bodyguard of a Very Important Person, should own, or even so much as touch, a firearm.

    We may regard them as no better than the government organ. For this government.

    Even Rand didn't figure on anything like this. If you'll recall, Henry Rearden carried a gun during his long walks. He was "carrying" when Ragnar Danneskjöld met him on that lonely road.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    and the people were mesmerized with American Idol and
    Dancing With The Stars and the Kardashians and, well, even
    Sunday Night Football ... as they turned into sheeple. . sad. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • 10
    Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 8 months ago
    First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Socialist.

    Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Jew.

    Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

    And before they came for anyone ...
    THEY TOOK AWAY THEIR FIREARMS.

    But before they could take the firearms ...
    they used the media to turn people into sheep.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 8 months ago
    First thing... Consider the source. NY Times started out as a paper completely devoted to 'yellow journalism.' It has since graduated to the status of being known as the paper that routinely fabricates stories. It's located in a city of looters and moochers. A city that absent having been hit by terrorists would still be considered the embarrassing armpit of the naiton. You may find them equal to or greater than a bunch of pot heads. I find them pathetic. They are clearly not Pace Picante material and never will be,

    So why get all incensed over the meaningless antics of seven million amazing assholes?

    You may add Chicago to that last and a few others. They don't count and demonstrably can't count.

    Two buildings and four thousand bodies and they are still the armpit of the nation.

    Nevertheless I shall ditto the comment that follows and the disgust I feel for what is clearly the comments of 'enemies domestic. There The two thumbs up is official.



    And that goes double for their yellow rag.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 8 months ago
    The two paragraphs read like the opposite of what the Founders had in mind.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo