While we're very happy to have you in the Gulch and appreciate your wanting to fully engage, some things in the Gulch (e.g. voting, links in comments) are a
privilege, not a right. To get you up to speed as quickly as possible, we've provided two options for earning these privileges.
- You must reach a Gulch score of 100. You can earn points in the Gulch by posting content, commenting, or by other members voting up your posts.
- You may upgrade to a Galt's Gulch Producer membership to immediately gain these privileges.
Your current Gulch score:
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
I was impressed by her speed, compentency, accurancy, and level service she was able to provide. She put just about every crew worker I remember from my job to shame (myself included). At the time, I wondered why she took her job so seriously. I mean it is a "shit job". I guess I have grown a lot since then :).
Those people who are Rand's villains in real life recognize themselves in her fiction, and don't want others to discover their dirty secrets.
Bill Gates almost falls into the same category - he was a better visionary and salesman then programmer.
For examples of Pat Logan in my life, I could literally list at least several dozens, if not a few hundred. I've worked with others since I was 8 or so in more varied fields and areas than I could possibly list here. In every one of those experiences, I've met and admired men and a few women, (often wishing that I could also find the contentment and pride in finding a satisfying niche) that were so competent and happy in their work, that they demonstrated an ease, grace, and confidence that was simply amazing. In all of those cases, I seldom heard a complaint about pay or relative positions (except when obviously dealing with incompetence), generally they were glad to accept new projects and invariably found or had apprentice types that they gladly taught and/or mentored. They were commonly honorable and loyal to those that remembered to acknowledge them with a simple 'Thank you' or 'Good job.'
Such people were often very key persons to operations and companies, though seldom willing to look for or accept promotion. I found myself using those individuals to 'teach' new supervisors and managers, much like the grizzled platoon Sgt. with the shavetail 1st Lt.
I think that it's a matter of pride in oneself and the happiness developed in having found that expertise that provides that pride.
Atlas has a special meaning for me due to the fact that I work for a large corporation that is run by the granddaughter of the founder. I think of her as our own "Miss Taggart". Fortunately, there is no "James Taggart" in the organization.
Thank you for bringing this succinct article to our attention. The point of respecting all for doing their best and being productive being at the heart of the matter, not how rich you are, can't be stressed enough.
When has Rachel been right??? I tried for too long to hear something reasonable from her and gave up. Her analysis is so shallow and biased I worry for her audience.
Regards,
O.A.
Perhaps by saying "humble" I am meaning a different thing. Pat Logan was confident of his abilities to drive the train. As such, I'm certainly not humble of my abilities to make pottery. I KNOW that I make expertly hand crafted pottery, one piece at a time, in just the manner that potters have made pottery for centuries. However, I think that some might come into my studio and see my methods of production and chastise me for not using modern techniques. In that respect I would respectfully explain the differences, knowing that I'm not working in the most cost efficient method and humbly accept that they may not understand why I work as I do. It is simply that sometimes the value of the work can exceed the payment that can be asked. This is a very anti-objectivist thing to say, but as long as I can make pottery I will, knowing that few would ever pay the true value. To those who will, I gratefully accept their money. To those who can't pay that much, I'll accept what payment I can charge.
Take the most popular item I sell - a mug. It costs $10 to make a mug, materials, firing cost, equipment, building and then I spend $4-$5 selling that mug. In order to cover the costs, replace equipment, pay for insurance and a bit for my time, I need to get $25 for that mug. In some markets I can, but not here where I live and work. Most of the time I actually get $18-$20 and if I wholesale the mug, I'll get $12.
Every potter you see in a art show who makes what are called "functional pieces" works with these dynamics. In todays marketplace we don't compete with each other, we compete with China and people's "perceived value" of our work which is based on the price of mass produced work from China.
Yes, working in mud, even the finest work makes one humble. It really brings you down to earth. As one well known potter put it, when you have mud, you make mudpies, but in the end it's still mud. LOL
Load more comments...