While we're very happy to have you in the Gulch and appreciate your wanting to fully engage, some things in the Gulch (e.g. voting, links in comments) are a
privilege, not a right. To get you up to speed as quickly as possible, we've provided two options for earning these privileges.
- You must reach a Gulch score of 100. You can earn points in the Gulch by posting content, commenting, or by other members voting up your posts.
- You may upgrade to a Galt's Gulch Producer membership to immediately gain these privileges.
Your current Gulch score:
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
Ayn Rand described a driver of a city bus "expertly maneuvering the large vehicle" in glowing terms. It seems that she saw that any position in life could be aspired to. That any position in life could be so expertly worked that the workman should glow in the performance. And it seems to me that she would see such expert workmanship having it's own reward, quite separated from the payscale. After all, a expert garbageman who goes to great lengths to stand my cans upright and put the lids back on correctly would be a great employee and great for the customer, but I doubt they would ever earn what a CEO will.
I know many craftsmen who excel in their hand work and trade. Some earn fare livings, but others just get by. While they may be expert craftsman, most are not expert businessmen.
oh, you are different....
I have met many as well. But now we spend so much of our time with entrepreneurs running companies, that I was interested in some of these producers that have impressed gulchers.
"It is the left that divides up the world into “the rich” and “everybody else.” Rand doesn’t think in those terms.
Atlas, for instance, includes rich heroes (Hank Rearden, Francisco D’Anconia) and non-rich heroes (John Galt, Quentin Daniels), as well as rich villains (James Taggart, Orren Boyle) and non-rich villains (the Starnes heirs)."
The novel is all about productive and unproductive, and that is a big difference. Those who hate the novel are generally unproductive. It is very unlikely that a hard worker would find Atlas Shrugged bad literature. Because they can relate to it. Those who are lazy, can't.
I have had numerous individuals that have worked for me when I was a manager. Previous managers had pushed some of them to take on more responsibility, or greater span of control. That's not what they wanted. After discussing their objectives, I was happy to support them in being the best - draftsman, mechanic, graphic technical writer, etc. - that they could be and not push them beyond what they wanted to be. We needed good and competent people in those skills, and I was grateful that they were good and competent, and not unhappy or looking for another job because they felt they weren't appreciated for the contributions that they made.