JUDGE: FBI IS READY TO INDICT HILLARY OVER EMAILS

Posted by $ Olduglycarl 9 years, 9 months ago to Government
71 comments | Share | Flag

Will it be: What difference does it make or will it be: This makes it different?


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 3.
  • Posted by term2 9 years, 9 months ago
    I hope the FBI does indict her and get RID of her once and for all. She has been involved in so many very bad things to protect herself and her husband. But she has been careful and hopefully this time she wasnt.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And if that happens I would love to grab my chase lounge and an umbrella drink to watch her pick up garbage by the road side with ball and chain in that "orange pantsuit"!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The point was that because they granted a witness immunity meant procedurally that they had already convene a grand jury.
    Where it goes from here, in this platonian kakistocracy is anyone's guess.
    But I thought the statement by Judge Napolitano (whom I respect) was important enough to share.
    Don't care about the fbi...they no longer stand with America.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 9 months ago
    I have a great deal of respect for Napolitano. He is a Constitutionalist and a Libertarian. If what he says is true, and still, (and it is) no one is indicted, then there no longer is a criminal justice system in the USA. Worse yet, if a scapegoat is indicted (although I can't see how that could be) we, as a nation may well be not worth saving. We shall see.
    As I have said before in these precincts, hope for the best, prepare for the worst. Which may well be our motto.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 9 months ago
    as one of their 2 resident judges (don't forget Jeanine!) .......
    both know that Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton is on the verge
    of gaining an orange pantsuit. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mec4cdlic 9 years, 9 months ago
    Olduglycarl - you posted the invalid material from Steve Watson. If you are going to post someone else's material, at least correct it. The FBI does not indict, it investigates. When it turns its findings over to the Dept of Justice (Loretta Lynch), then the DOJ decides if it wants to write up a bill of indictment to give to the sitting grand jury (GJ). If at least twelve of the grand jury members agree to indict, then it goes back to the DOJ. If at least twelve do not agree to indict, then it dies in the court. Now, if the DOJ gets the indictment from the GJ, then the DOJ still has the prerogative whether or not to either press those charges, bring lesser charges, or drop the case. But - Steve Watson blindly posted that the "FBI is ready to indict" and you just passed it along - like Trump re-tweeting stuff blindly, with no regard to the truth. You are better than that, Carl, I have faith in you.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ycandrea 9 years, 9 months ago
    This mean nothing. She and hubby always get away with everything. It just doesn't seem to matter to her "fans".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by fivedollargold 9 years, 9 months ago
    Because DOJ gave Grant of Immunity to the Hildeliar's computer geek, it is likely that Hussein will permit DOJ to indict. Biden will be disappointed because HRC will not turn over her delegates to him when she withdraws. Nor will she give her precious, hard-one delegates to the madman from Vermont. There is only one logical person to receive them. Imagine the debates between the Trumpster and future president...Chelsea Clinton.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by MagicDog 9 years, 9 months ago
    She will continue to run for president from a jail cell if necessary.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 9 months ago
    The Slick Willie presidential sex predator's enabler is too privileged to fail.
    Decades of corruption and dead witnesses trail the purple cloak of a now very rich crime queen.
    I saw a dialog two balloon cartoon in my email yesterday.
    A person asks Hillary: "What is the first thing you'll do as president?"
    Hillary: "Pardon myself."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by walkabout 9 years, 9 months ago
    My wife retired from University teaching a couple of years ago just to avoid this type of thing. Her fear was she would say something absolutely true and needed to be heard by the student (as a professor once called me a 'dunderhead'); as in "if you don't like to read and if your writing reflects your ability to think, then no, you are not graduate school material.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Napolitano judges by the constitution...the other one I am not familiar with but by judging by what was said...complete idiot on koolaid and drugs.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Susanne 9 years, 9 months ago
    Likely, the presidential pardon is sitting on his desk, O has been on the phone, and is getting his Pen warmed up...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It goes to the Justice Department and whats her face makes the final decision. That will depends on what her O'BOSS!Ma tells her to do. That will depend if he likes BurnMe or Trump as the next left wing socialist occupant of the WH. On the other hand who could resign just in time for Biden to take over......and then run as the sitting President. ObeyMe and his Attorney General leech aren't above any of that.
    Not like he has a legacy to defend....spite would be a good enough reason. Or a big pay off from the Clinton foundation.e

    One day I must learn to learn the difference between Napolitano and the other one from Arizona who said all veterans and active military were the countries biggest danger.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Temlakos 9 years, 9 months ago
    That's not a sitting judge. That's Judge Andrew P. Napolitano, late of the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, in and for the Vicinage of Essex. And that's only his layman's opinion.

    I agree that Judge Nap is the nearest thing to Judge Narragansett. But can the FBI pursue an indictment on their own? I don't think so. They need a sympathetic United States Attorney (USA) or Assistant (AUSA).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree completely. Personally I'm just so sick of hearing these things and nothing happens. More false hope. Of course maybe this will be the real thing.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I know, but what the Judge said was important. That's why I am sharing it and we get a glimpse of the procedures.
    The Kakistocracy must be run out of town...heck, it pervades world governments...we have to run them off the planet, otherwise we'll never be free.
    Wouldn't a worthy goal be turning the entire planet into a Galt Gulch?
    Don't wake my up from that dream until morn...Ok?
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo