Can we even agree on these?

A just system of laws that outlines our movements, (rules of the road), and interactions in society, in 'civil'ization' would and should consider private property...this is not suggested in the brief synopsis of this body of work. But perhaps its discussed in this mans book.

Also not discussed is how to treat a person, ideology or a culture that opposes you by 180, especially when they mean to coerce, defraud, disempower or physically harm you.
How the hell are you supposed to be "civil" and respectful to that person or persons.

It is interesting that more and more these days, since I wrote about consciousness and it's effects on the paradigm, that conscience is referred to as necessary for a decent society.

Now, we've discussed basic morality and ethics recently and how it applies to objectiveism...so how do these 3 basic pillars for a decent society stack up with Rand and being objective.