Obama Apologizes for Prisoner Swap, Judge Napolitano Says He Should Be Impeached

Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 10 years, 11 months ago to Government
40 comments | Share | Flag

The scandals are coming so “Fast and Furious” that I can’t keep up. One must wonder if they create these situations so as to numb the public and instill ennui.

The prospect of Impeachment, while appealing, may have unfavorable repercussions in the next few elections by aggravating and mobilizing the democratic/progressive base. Strategically what should be done to minimize the damage and improve the future outlook?

All Comments

Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Good morning YNGH,
    Quite right. The headline is a bit misleading. The only apology was for not notifying the congress as required by law and it came from a spokesperson. Pathetic!
    Regards,
    O.A.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Good morning kathywiso,
    Good to hear from you. :)
    I quite agree. This is outrageous. Unfortunately, considering the track record, I fear no one but some low level sacrificial lamb will suffer any serious repercussions.
    Regards,
    O.A.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by kathywiso 10 years, 11 months ago
    I shudder to think of the things we DON'T know about that he is doing. This is even beyond Atlas Shrugged, no longer fiction... The king releasing prisoners that are surely going to be killing American's in the near future is treasonous and deserves a good hanging. If this doesn't wake the dead, nothing will.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I was outraged, though not surprised by the words of Susan Rice once again on the Sunday talk shows when she said Bergdahl "served the United States with honor and distinction". If I was her, I would be ticked off if I was fed another piece of unqualified propaganda to disseminate. I don't know if she is a collaborator or a dupe... Either way she looks like a fool.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Good morning johnrober2,
    It does seem quite unlikely. It would take two thirds of the Senate and even after the election, despite the predicted turnover, the numbers will not be there. Between the sycophants and the compliant media I believe the best we can expect is to slow the hemorrhage.
    Regards,
    O.A.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    When someone lies, they frequently are not caught directly in the falsehood (although these bumblers often are); they are most often caught in the coverup. When one builds off of a flimsy foundation, the structure inevitably crumbles. That should be a corollary to "Contradictions cannot exist.".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    This is precisely my argument against the Convention of States as well. Undoubtedly RimCountry will re-initiate our little discussion.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ johnrobert2 10 years, 11 months ago
    Impeachment will never happen. If what has gone before is any indication, there are enough apologists out there to successfully block any attempt at redress. And the more he gets away with it, the more egregious the next scenario will be until we have no form of government except feudalism, with him and his cronies in control.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 10 years, 11 months ago
    Regarding impeachment, that actually has a higher probability than the Convention of States. If neither work, the few of us who have not yet shrugged should shrug.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 10 years, 11 months ago
    Regarding "One must wonder if they create these situations so as to numb the public and instill ennui.", that is the Cloward-Piven goal. If we shrug, we actually encourage them toward their goal of public ennui.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Good morning jbrenner,
    On both points I quite agree. What is going on is so stupid I find it difficult to believe people who are apparently capable of tying their own shoes are simply making so many idiotic fumbles, unless there is more to it. And I am not much for conspiracies... but...
    Regards,
    O.A.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo