Clinton (Again) Breaks Laws (Federal) By Skipping Required Ethics (What Is THAT?) Training Including the Annual Reviews."
Katie Pavlich
|
Posted: Aug 19, 2016 1:30 PM
Did Clinton and Top Aides Break Federal Law By Skipping Required Ethics Course at The State Department?
File this under: Totally predictable.
Upon assuming her appointment as Secretary of State in 2009, Hillary Clinton and her top aides were required to take an ethics class to better understand the way the Department functioned and their responsibilities to the law in their new positions. It looks like they didn't go. From McClatchy:
There is no evidence that Hillary Clinton or her top aides completed ethics training when they started at the State Department as required by federal law.
State Department records show only three of nine top Clinton aides took the mandated training for new employees. Records also suggest that none of seven top aides required to take subsequent annual training completed it.
No records indicate whether Clinton herself took any training.
Many of the aides still work for Clinton on her presidential campaign or are advising her in her bid for the White House against Republican Donald Trump in November.
This news isn't surprising and considering Hillary Clinton's decades long, unethical record before becoming Secretary of State, there's little doubt the course would have made any impact on her self-centered and wreckless decisions.
After all, when you place personal convenience and oversight evasion above the national security of the United States and the personal safety of our spies, there's not much thought about "ethics" at all.
Also keep in mind it is not unlikely Clinton and her top aides purposely skipped ethics training in order to keep their ability to plead ignorance about the rules.
"We're not allowed to use private email servers hosted in bathroom closets to store top secret, classified information? We had no idea! What exactly is the Federal Records Act? Oh, we're not allowed to delete thousands of emails? Sorry!"
|
Posted: Aug 19, 2016 1:30 PM
Did Clinton and Top Aides Break Federal Law By Skipping Required Ethics Course at The State Department?
File this under: Totally predictable.
Upon assuming her appointment as Secretary of State in 2009, Hillary Clinton and her top aides were required to take an ethics class to better understand the way the Department functioned and their responsibilities to the law in their new positions. It looks like they didn't go. From McClatchy:
There is no evidence that Hillary Clinton or her top aides completed ethics training when they started at the State Department as required by federal law.
State Department records show only three of nine top Clinton aides took the mandated training for new employees. Records also suggest that none of seven top aides required to take subsequent annual training completed it.
No records indicate whether Clinton herself took any training.
Many of the aides still work for Clinton on her presidential campaign or are advising her in her bid for the White House against Republican Donald Trump in November.
This news isn't surprising and considering Hillary Clinton's decades long, unethical record before becoming Secretary of State, there's little doubt the course would have made any impact on her self-centered and wreckless decisions.
After all, when you place personal convenience and oversight evasion above the national security of the United States and the personal safety of our spies, there's not much thought about "ethics" at all.
Also keep in mind it is not unlikely Clinton and her top aides purposely skipped ethics training in order to keep their ability to plead ignorance about the rules.
"We're not allowed to use private email servers hosted in bathroom closets to store top secret, classified information? We had no idea! What exactly is the Federal Records Act? Oh, we're not allowed to delete thousands of emails? Sorry!"
As a socialist extremist in the Lykoff Soros mold she has no morals nor ethics the way decent people think of them. Incapable of such a thing.
What we must understand is; "We will will hand separately or we will hang together"
Benjamin Franklin
Hillary has her own set of ethics, and it's morally corrupt!
Some pigs are more piggish than other pigs and when you lie with pigs you get just as dirty. Spit rolls down hill and guess who goes to jail.
If she had taken the ethics course, now THAT would be a surprise.
"Oh, how quaint."
"Yeah, sure."
"Like hell I would."
"Who am I? Miss Goody Two Shoes?
"Oh, yeah? Never give a sucker an even break."
"This wimp instructor doesn't know the power of telling a fib enough times."
"Wonder what Bill is up to today."
"Right makes might? Ha! I'm a ruler--not a schooler."
"Consequences for actions? Tell that to my fixed FBI and DOJ."
"Wonder if I can get hands on a copy of the final exam."
"If not, wonder what dirt I can get on this instructor."
"If not that, I got that go-between to call. RIP, instructor!"
When is this smug elitists head going to finally roll???
After all when you put personal convenience above the lives of the men and women you are sending in harms way are you really fit to be Commander-In-Chief?
What if it was children or grand children wearing the uniform?
Would you really feel proud of the vote you cast to help them get elected?
Or would yiou say "We had no idea!....Really?" To your offsprings children or neighbors children or announce it proudly in the net or on this forum?
1. Stop Enabling
2. Take Control
3. Make Changes.
Not going to get 3 without 1 and 2.
Buit the look in your grandchilds eye is going to be with you forever when you try to explain supporting the candidate that killed their father or mother. Your problem. Not mine.