All Comments

  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 12 years, 4 months ago
    “Society will develop a new kind of servitude which covers the surface of society with a network of complicated rules, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate. It does not tyrannise but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd.”
    ― Alexis de Tocqueville
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ winterwind 12 years, 4 months ago
    We used to have a friend who owned a gun store; he would work the buy-back lines, offering to pay more than the buy-back program would. He often did very well - and so did the sellers. The police didn't like it, but he was scrupulous about obeying the law [back when you could tell what it meant!]
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Rocky_Road 12 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    They still get to run in the re-election, so this will be a great test of the true feelings of their constituency. My fingers are crossed!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Tap2Golf 12 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, indeed. The author and his/her supporters assume that with all those guns removed from the streets, crime will simply cease...and they can all live happily ever after. Very short-sighted and dim-witted! The 2nd amendment gives us the right to bear arms, not to commit crime but to protect ourselves FROM crime. Sadly, sometimes the law enforcement agents have to use there guns...ergo, hopefully we don't, in the matter of protection.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Rocky_Road 12 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Only if she forgot to check for any live rounds before throwing the guns into the smelting pot...and it went off, and took off her right ear.

    She could become the 21st century Vincent van Gogh.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Tap2Golf 12 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That makes a lot of sense. Why take a perfectly good piece of merchandise and destroy it. Some are antiques and beautiful. I have wondered sometimes how many never make it to the melt-down pot.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Spinkane 12 years, 4 months ago
    I wonder if the author of this new law even considered a police officer disarming a criminal perpetrating gun violence without first having researched the thugs background? It seems to me, progressives fail to recognize reality and their good ideas often have unintended consequences; sometimes horribly. A quote that best describes the progressive ideology is “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.”
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Rocky_Road 12 years, 4 months ago
    I don't like the buy-back programs that destroy perfectly good guns.

    There are some that I have seen that allow the guns to be resold by licensed dealers, and some of the profits are returned to the community.

    The recalls in the article are encouraging!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ rockymountainpirate 12 years, 4 months ago
    Hahaha. I guess the progressive anti 2nd Amendment guys shot themselves in the foot with that one.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 12 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Nope. She can buy her own guns and destroy them and melt them down and call it awareness art. **eye roll with tongue hanging out**
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo