Scientists Change Their View on Space: It Is About Time
Of course you'll never hear this in lamestream news or publications...it's spoken of softly in dark corners these days.
"While I endured many years of frustration, now I can enjoy and take pride in the fact that I have been trying to promote a concept that has been proven to be correct."
"While I endured many years of frustration, now I can enjoy and take pride in the fact that I have been trying to promote a concept that has been proven to be correct."
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
He does not seem to have a firm understanding of physics like some of those on the crank.net.
Some things stood out. The Sun's atmosphere has a higher temperature than the inside where fusion takes place. Magnetic field swirling around electrical current. It is normal to the current and most likely is not swirling. Takes an idea and just runs with it making up a good physics sounding yarn.
Shows every sign of crankiness where his ideas are dismissed by established scientists and no one will listen.
The Sun's magnetic field, and its role in sunspots etc, has been known for yonks. Some useful background here: http://cse.ssl.berkeley.edu/segwayed/...
To say that because the activity of the Sun - a giant ball of plasma - is related to magnetic fields that therefore so is the Earth - not plasma - is bizarre.
For the sake of not wasting time, energy and credibility, honing one's "crackpot antenna" is a useful exercise for all.
Time may be a derivative of the action of things. It may be a derivative. It may be animation by a certain disiance.Then ascribe like a length from point or area A to point or area B.
.
Back in the 60s I was reading magazine articles and admiring speculative illustrations that had us colonizing Mars before now.
I was chastised for saying that the "Scientific World is about to be turned on it's ear" and we'd be on our way to really getting a sense of how existence works. Now, maybe some that are willing to see,.. why I said that.
Ah, reading what I wrote, I see it can be construed that way That last sentence..
I was just expressing my surprise is all.
I have been learning a wide assortment of stuff in the Gulch.
This new approach at cosmology could be on to something really big.
Revealed in the video ObjectiveAnalyst submitted, Albert Einstein admitted to some perplexing thing that seemed to fall short of his calculations.
I was introduced to this work as a result of my membership, involvement and investing in the Suspicious Observer Group.
Part of my reason for coming into the Gulch was to learn. But to learn stuff like this?!
Have you seen Thunderbolts of the Gods? It is related to your story.
I think some may find this very interesting. It is about the massive influence of electric currents and magnetism being more predominate in our universe than previously considered.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AUA7...
Respectfully,
O.A.
That's how you prove theories. With proof.
+1 from old dino.
We all have benefited from those who think outside the box. Light bulbs and if men were meant to fly etc.
This theory has the potential of enhancing space travel and predicting earthquakes.. Or maybe not.