How To Actually Fight Terrorism In 6 Simple Steps

Posted by khalling 7 years, 7 months ago to Culture
12 comments | Share | Flag

from Author Vinay Kolhatkar:"Brainwashed and guided by the neo-Marxists, our mainstream media hosts and major politicians spout platitudes about something being a great religion, use ambiguous terms like “a war on terror,” and then offer to make “radicalization and extremism” the enemy.

In late 2010, the neo-Marxist intellectuals sold the Western media a story—a story that a democracy without a constitution is a value worth fighting for, that even if the democratic mob rule of a majority leads to a totalitarian theocracy, it somehow is better than the secular economic freedom individuals may have enjoyed under a military dictatorship."

Check out Vinay's new novel dealing with Islamic terrorism, specifically against women: "A Sharia London" https://www.amazon.com/Sharia-London-...


All Comments

  • Posted by 7 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    he wouldn't dignify your response with a comment. He is Objectivist, sir. As far from religious extremism as you can get. I do not know how you could have read such crap into the article-but nothing about you comes as a surprise anymore
    Reply | Permalink  
  • -1
    Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "this leads you to label the author as a religious extremist how?"
    I said it's helpful to religious extremists. I do not know if that's Mr. Kolhatkar's intention. It would be interesting to meet him at one of those events since he has a radically different view.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Technocracy 7 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And this leads you to label the author as a religous extremist how?

    I met Vinay at the Atlas Summit in 2015. He is not a religous extremist.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • -1
    Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "The author of this is far from a religious extremist."
    I disagree with the article and would have hard time thinking up material more helpful to Islamists.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 7 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yeah, I've given up on him. Between his support of HRC & the climate change crap, he is a lost cause to me. No longer worth the time to comment on his stuff. I no Trump supporter either but I'd rather be shot than vote for her.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 7 years, 7 months ago
    Another brilliant contribution from Vinay.

    There is so much great material here,
    I particularly like-
    "We can’t continue to preach non-violence to a man who has pulled a gun on us.
    His disarmament or extinction is an immediate necessity.
    The dialogue with the rest can recommence shortly thereafter."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I guess so close to the election, he's stressed for his support for HRC. Ask him if he did a fundraiser for her....and I am NO Trumpster
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    in what world do you think I would even be patient with you for such outrageous comments?! You either did not read the article, your "white privilege" is showing, or the old CG we love to hate shows his true colors once again. flag
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 7 months ago
    I imagine religious extremists sponsoring this article to spread their world view. They were searching for an American ISIS supporter but settled for an Australian. The target audience are confused people who hardly know the difference between American and Australia anyway. The central theme is to promote extremist crime by saying all the crap about infidels you picked up in your sporadic attendance of madrasas is actually true!

    I get the reason for shoehorning in Marxism-- there was decades-law Cold War associated with Marxism, and ISIS-supporters can aggrandize religious extremists by drawing an analogy to the USSR. I see that point, but it's just too much of a stretch, too hamfisted. Half-truths are more effective than lies from whole cloth.

    It makes me wish we could encourage as many potentially-confused young people as possible to visit the US, work some job, and take a class. The US is not like the American and Canadian TV shows they furtively watch, but it's not like the ISIS view promoted in this article either. It's people actually living a dream life of reason and liberty (compared to living in theocracy), doing what they want in a pluralistic society, and keeping most (not enough) of what they make for themselves.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo