While we're very happy to have you in the Gulch and appreciate your wanting to fully engage, some things in the Gulch (e.g. voting, links in comments) are a
privilege, not a right. To get you up to speed as quickly as possible, we've provided two options for earning these privileges.
- You must reach a Gulch score of 100. You can earn points in the Gulch by posting content, commenting, or by other members voting up your posts.
- You may upgrade to a Galt's Gulch Producer membership to immediately gain these privileges.
Your current Gulch score:
I understand. It is not just potential voyeurism that I object to. It is the overall proliferation of cameras everywhere. It is a precursor to 1984. I object to being under surveillance. I would like to reserve the right to choose when I have my picture taken. When someone is carrying a camera or holding up a smart phone you have at least some notion of when a picture may be taken. At least then I might have opportunity to smile. :)
Regards,
O.A.
I don't want to derail this discussion from the original content (too much). You can leave you final remarks, and I'll leave you alone.
Regards,
O.A.
You should know the story is not about the glasses recording ability or the fact that they have a red light that flashes when doing so. It is about their ability to tap into local security cameras. Incidentally it would not take much ingenuity and perhaps a bit of tape or nail polish to cover the light in regard to the glasses themselves.
Respectfully,
O.A.
Now...give this medical history access to law enforcement, and first responders, and all bets are off.