While we're very happy to have you in the Gulch and appreciate your wanting to fully engage, some things in the Gulch (e.g. voting, links in comments) are a
privilege, not a right. To get you up to speed as quickly as possible, we've provided two options for earning these privileges.
- You must reach a Gulch score of 100. You can earn points in the Gulch by posting content, commenting, or by other members voting up your posts.
- You may upgrade to a Galt's Gulch Producer membership to immediately gain these privileges.
Your current Gulch score:
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
BTW, Isn't it ironic that the Democrats who have cozied up to the Russian Communists for a very, very long time, suddenly find them offensive.
We live in very interesting and dangerous times to be sure.
The Clintons sold uranium to Russia? I did not know that. Why would that be ok? Can any country buy our uranium? Does the state dept handle that kind of sale?
Respectfully
DOB
The fact that so many on both the right and the left are mad as hell about these issues demonstrates to me the validity of Eisenhower's farewell address warning about the military-industrial complex, which IMHO has raised this false flag. This is much bigger than right-left opposition. It's about maintaining a decades long political-economic strategy of continuous conflict.
I have three thirty something nieces who through out the campaign posted on Facebook daily. Most were about how anyone who supported Trump was all the ist's or phobes they could come up with. I have to say I lost all respect for them.
My wife set up a face book page to have a page for my art work , on a suggestion from a friend.
The first day I was responding to some liberal trash about the need for taking guns from everyone. My beautiful wonderful wife asked what I was doing and I told her. She put the kabbash on that , rightly so because it was her page. But even so , I didn't like that they were not being challenged for their false premises and distortions.
Then when Trump won they were crying about what to tell their 5 yr olds because a monster is president. When the 64' election took place I asked my dad who did you vote for and he said none of my business ( I was 6). He was right.
Have a good evening.
What is most important and is really being overlooked is the content and intent in those emails. Assange and a top govt official from Iceland have said that time and again . The leak was from insiders and one of them is dead.
What, fake news from the NYT? "all the news that is fit to print" fit as in to further the shredding of the constitution
People voted for Trump in the middle of the country because they didn't want the cool-aid.
That reminds me of the tragedy in Guyana and Jonestown. with Billary as Jim Jones.
David Faber made a snide comment about how long will it be before Trump opens up mining in Yellowstone National park. If those media hacks were doing their job. They could have exposed the vile corrupt evil hag and her minions but instead they worship her at the alter. Idiots!
Hillary is like a three year old that tries to hide by covering her head, thinking that if she can't see you, you can't see her. Ducking the public and letting others act as cover for her attempts to reverse her loss is pathetically obvious.
What I find unbelievable is that the Democrats don't realize that with the flood of new jobs being promised by domestic and foreign businesses under a Trump administration, their attempts to destroy that hopeful future are not making people happy. Each clumsy grasp at trying to snatch the Presidency away from the candidate who honestly won the job eats away at their credibility. They're letting the Clinton toxin poison the party.
2) Leaking is getting into your stuff that you tried to hide, and exposing it to the light of day. If anything, THIS is what happened, and it SHOULD happen all the time.
3) As to influencing the election, the media did FAR more than any russians in distorting and even changing the facts to foster voting for Hillary. But helping Hillary is OK. Objectivity towards Trump is considered Bad.
4) This is just one more attempt to discredit Trump and perhaps re-install Hillary in power. It would be very bad for the country if they succeeded, and would probably result in civil unrest.
Me dino recalls during the last presidential debate Trump trumpeting that he would have a problem accepting a loss if he thought a fix was in (like what happened to Bolshevik Bernie).
Me dino can't recall the exact words as the evil hag then quite pompously responded that it was a great American tradition for a candidate to graciously accept a loss and the peaceful transfer of power.
This was applauded as if the raspy-voiced crime godmother had also said, "Bad hair day, what the hell is wrong with you?"
Of course, $hillary is now being sneaky about how she gets others to rattle her cage in protest.
The cage she should be locked inside, of course, provided with an orange jumpsuit.
Your comments are always concise, respectful and informative. I was not aware of the Coast Guard being an agency that was familiar with cyber hacking. The bigger issue is the unethical behavior revealed by wikileaks. These Dems are never responsible for any failures it is always the same.
Inauguration day can't come soon enough.
I believe that Trump will negotiate an agreement with the Russians to help eliminate ISIS, at least I hope so.
warm regards,
DOB
Load more comments...