Global climate change
I have two questions about climate change: 1. What is the primary cause of climate change? 2. Who benefits by publishing faulty data?
While we're very happy to have you in the Gulch and appreciate your wanting to fully engage, some things in the Gulch (e.g. voting, links in comments) are a privilege, not a right. To get you up to speed as quickly as possible, we've provided two options for earning these privileges.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
The temperature of air is not just from the one part in 2500 of CO2 in those 2500 molecules and atoms of N2, O2, and Ar which do not absorb well in the infrared, but gain the energy indicated by their temperatures from transfer of energy from the ground by conduction or from transfer of rotational, translational, or vibrational energy from green house gases which occur in very small amounts other than water vapor. Some of the energy absorbed from the Sun by the N2, O2, and Ar is also in the microwave and radio energies in which they emit radiation.
As for faulty data, there has been a very large loss of personal integrity in the last fifty to 100 years. Today, due to political or social pressure of keeping a well paying job, one is nearly required produce reports which fit the required outcome asked for by the employer. For the climate change investigation of the IPCC it is required to fudge reality due to the purpose of the study proposed by them. The study was to find out how humans affected the climate and not to study climate in all ways. Some of the results which are contrary to human caused climate change are buried in foot notes and in references rather than being discussed in the main bodies of the reports, so just a small amount of dishonesty.
Also, please find a video on Climate Change: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d09cJ...
Or the PowerPoint in the video: https://taep.memberclicks.net/assets/...
My little girl, The Pink Panther!
The You Can't See Me International Lady Of Mystery!
Wait, now I got it~CAT WOMAN!
But of course, my next question is: what events taking place either within the sun, or on its surface, is responsible for what appears to be random "sun storm" activity.?
In fact there was an article I saw recently where the end of the last great ice age may have been helped along by an underwater CO2 release.
Also, CO2 seems to increase after global temperature rises, not causing the increase. Which then the question: What chemical is actually causing the rise in temperature? That very well may be Water Vapor, which holds more energy than does CO2. And, if we see that solar activity increases, melts the icecaps, creates more water to turn into water vapor, which in turn creates more warming. Much easier to explain and see the correlation too, than CO2.
Next time she'll be more careful!!
I'd tell her to think about it during a short time out.
She's way too young for anything more strict.
She might try "time out"--you sit there for awhile and think about not just what you did but why you did it. It would depend on the child's own ability to reason, and her concept of "cause and effect."
Rappers appear obsessed with the cookie jar.
Me dino hates rap.
Further down the column I found a much better video~
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wi3Qo...
I was thinking of the "Allerod Oscillation, prior to the "Younger Dryas Impact. And may have contributed to the "Neolithic Revolution."
Oh, well~can't win 'em all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2f-M...
Now humans may have a small effect on climate, but more likely in localized settings, not worldwide. Heat zones, loss of vegetation, particulate concentrations, and massive structures within cities could create a change in weather patterns both within and outside the city (more towards the direction of the prevailing winds). Hence more probability for severe storms. But once again, localized.
2) Those who benefit are: "Poor Countries"/ Dictators who through world regulations receive money from "Rich Countries" for whom are responsible for the "Changing Climate", so they can "Help" their people achieve what the "Rich Countries" have. Politicians who get kickbacks from organizations and people pushing the "Climate Change" initiative. Companies and Organizations that study and push the "Climate Change" initiative by deceiving or fear mongering the public into donations. Scientists and Academic Institutions who "Study" and report on "Climate Change", because they will get grant money or donations in order to keep studying and reporting on the "issue".
Load more comments...