Chemtrails or contrails. Surprise!!
$10,000,000,000 to create a solar shield to save the global climate.
While we're very happy to have you in the Gulch and appreciate your wanting to fully engage, some things in the Gulch (e.g. voting, links in comments) are a privilege, not a right. To get you up to speed as quickly as possible, we've provided two options for earning these privileges.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
Independent testing over the past decade confirms that Chemtrails around the country contain a dangerous and extremely poisonous mix of chemicals that includes: barium, nano aluminum-coated fiberglass [known as CHAFF], radioactive thorium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, desiccated blood, mold spores, yellow fungal ...
The Earth is a balanced thermodynamic system which means if you disturb one part it automatically changes another part to balance it out. The problem is its impossible to know what the consequent change will be. The models are approximations of the past and have little if any predictive power for thermodynamic systems in the future.
The article said Bill Gates and other foundations are substantially funding the project.
Aerofarms is a company that is ahead of the curve with this technique. Higher yields, artificial weather and a fertilized misting system on the roots means plants requires no soil.
I am going to look into a small growing system for myself.
Isn't it bad enough that we will suffer many crop failures due to increased cloud cover, wacky weather, flash freezes and snow at critical times of the growing seasons? Isn't it enough that we have lost most of the worlds winter wheat crops already this year?, (we could really do without modern day wheat, but even Spelt, an ancient wheat, would suffer the same consequences.)
Isn't it bad enough we are going into a grand solar minimum but we also have our magnetic shields weakened and our magnetic poles moving around further exposing us to cosmic radiation which in turn causes more cloud cover and charges our atmosphere effecting the brains of the unaware and health of all of us?
It's really not at all nice to screw with mother nature...nothing worse than a women scorned!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You probably saw this on crop failures.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2mxL...
It's not really about CO2, it's about stopping industry.
The funding is provided by Bill Gates and other foundations .
How about Gore, Gates, and Soros moves to Mars.
We get cold and wacky weather during these Grand Solar Minimums all over the globe.
"if global warming really is a problem" It is known that data on global temperatures is manipulated, tampered with and is fraudulent.
Posted by Brian Sussman in About The Book, Nationally Published Columns on Feb 6th, 2017
The global temperature is rigged to read warm. I revealed this fact in Climategate in 2010. I restated it in Eco-Tyranny in 2012. Today the Daily Mail verifies my work via government whistleblower: A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.
With the grand solar minimum and the reduced
magnetosphere that it causes on our planet. This will increase cloud cover as the cosmic rays
will enter the stratosphere and form more cloud cover causing a cooling effect. This has already started see: http://www.suspicious0bservers.org/
How about we just move the Earth to a larger orbit, or better yet, just move to Mars.
See Adapt2030 a site OlduglyCarl introduced me to.
https://www.youtube.com/user/MyanmarL...
This geo engineering has been going on for a decade and all you have to do is look in the sky and watch the horizon to horizon chemtrails that crisscross the blue.
The only way this makes any sense is if it is a process that can easily be adjusted; turn it on and off when it is scientifically proven to be needed.
There is no scientific proof whatsoever that anything needs to be done. The UN IPCC's Trenberth just admitted that they have no evidence. Their "models are just not good enough to predict the outcomes."
“our models are just not good enough to predict the outcomes”
Excuse me? Haven't the UN IPCC been telling everyone for decades that the science is settled and we MUST ACT immediately by destroying our world's economy by cutting use of the only available practical source of energy, i.e., hydrocarbons?
How can they rationally say such things when they admit that their "models are just not good enough to predict the outcomes”?
Those who promote such irrational, unsupportable, unscientific, destructive, counter-productive action are nothing more than lying, power mad, statist looters !
Trenberth just admitted they have been lying for decades.
Load more comments...