Tantamount to cultural appropriation...

And yet, those who deny that language has mean-
ing use language to make that denial, don't they?
Isn't that similar to using the "Stolen Concept"?

Here we go again, one half of one percent of the population want to push their own beliefs and alter the english language on the rest of the heterosexual population. This make me very angry! My alternative would have that population go for gene therapy and become normal heterosexuals.

Some, learn this behavior at an early age from someone a bit older...the gay community admits that this is the case 80% of the time...there aught to be a Law!
Additionally, besides the social structures; some of the stuff that is put into foods may have a cumulative effect as well. (suspected but not proven definitively.)

Laughing...I remember that one...now the culture lives by it.

I would say that gender choice can also be psychological. For example, if one feels uncomfortable being male/female, despite biological, physiological, and hormonal indicators, wanting and/or choosing to assume the opposite sexual identity generally reflects a psychological issue. That could include a desire to be different, to challenge sexual identities, or to gain (media) attention. Or even to be popular--those who are politically correct are forced to accept such persons. That said, biological reality can indeed be somewhat fluid, depending upon hormones and neurological differences.

What to call yourself does not have to be Target permanent.
For example, do you feels like the men's room or the women's room today?
Tomorrow, you just may feel more like the opposite room and that's okay.
"and that's okay?" I just remembered something I'll go fetch~
~here it is!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgaRd...
Whoa! "and he's okay?"
Never mind.

That's how I metaphorically describe "gender fluidity": sometimes, I feel like a nut...so call me walnut...BUT, sometimes I don't...check my pants as to what to call me.

Yeah, sometimes me dino just has to go rumble in the jungle.
Being exposed to silly stuff that short out brain cells can trigger that off.
Especially ze zany gender zaza zat libzirs take twit seriously.

I guess you momentarily "felt like a nut and now you don't".

I wonder, has anyone tested any of the delete ruleless parasitical humanoids that inhabit the worlds Kakistocracy's?

You are correct, race is an anti social construct within the progressive mindlessness.

*wonderings

Restore the constitution. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Zir dino xe oui oui the queen of France.
But call xe ein hir xe punch du in ze pants.

So sorry. Something mental in xe zir dino snapped.
Zagopiffus now, y'all.

Race is a social construct based on self identification as well. There is no definitive DNA test for race.

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-1997...

https://www.census.gov/topics/populat...

Only those who delude themselves wish to persuade others to join in their delusions. Those who choose Reality simply point to Reality and allow others to choose to accept it or not.

Language is a tool to share thought. We destroy language when we muddle definitions.

Word.

Ah, but whether one chooses to redecorate or rebuild one's house has no barring on what we call you...you are either male or female and that doesn't ever change.
The only expectation, whether we call you He or she, is what we might find in your pants,or your genes.
It is what it is...we don't care what's between your ears unless there is nothing at all; in that case, one should be barred from government...laughing.

Let me put it another way: Sometimes I feel like a Nut...sometimes I don't. In either case, I am a male member of the human species.

... and we still have the same old argument about gender. Sex is biological. Gender is cultural. I know that you do not agree, but I just want my vote counted.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-Spi...

Agreeded...it was closer to political writing. Maybe we should call it: Political Fiction...but even in those days as in these days...it wasn't fiction at all.

"The Greeks have a word for it." One of the consequences of the expanding Hellenic world was an expansion in the creation of new words and the assignment of new meanings to old words.

Cosmopolitan was a new word for a new condition: citizen of the world, not of just any one city, but all of the Helliades the entire koinon.

Axiom only meant "honored" and if something was "honored" it was above question, and so it came to mean, also, a good price or a bargain.

The love of money is the root of all evil, they said, but "the love of money" was a newly invented word to suit the purpose: PHILARGYRION - love of silver.

My niece is going to a "completenarian" Christian college where women are not allowed to teach theology to men. That took me to Wikipedia on Timothy 2:12 and this section on the meaning of the word AUTHENEO, which mean authority over, of course, but also murder or suicide. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1_Timot...
Those other meanings were extensives, derived from the basic concept. (Analogy or euphemism are not quite the right tropes, but I cannot think of better words right now.) But the point is the same: the Greeks did, as the article said, take both the literal (god-given) and contextual (societal) meanings of words. We do so, today. I pretty much do. (Think about my use of "pretty" there...)

As for the fine point of Orwell being a "great science fiction writer" I must demur. 1984 was much like science fiction, being set in the future of that time. However, not much else was within the science fiction genre and Orwell wrote nothing else similar. We might as well call him a "great fable writer" for Animal Farm. Orwell was a political writer. At least, that is how I understand him from Animal Farm, 1984, and Homage to Catalonia.

The key point about Newspeak is that there was less and less of it. The Party was shrinking the language to reduce the ability to think. The goal was to be a doubleplusgood ducktalker, to repeat the Party message without thinking. Duplicitous terms such as Minipax (ministry of peace for the ministry of war) only reflected the actual abuse of language, as in our own Department of Defense.

And, yet, that change did reflect, and important conceptual shift: the only justification for war is defense. Aggression is wrong. That is very different from the view of the ancient Greeks who held that the cries of the victims that the conquerors are unjust are only the cries of the hare as the eagle carries it off in accordance with natural law.