Road to Recovery: Ten Steps for the Constitution and Liberty
I can't find fault with any of this and have to agree.
You type: | You see: |
---|---|
*italics* | italics |
**bold** | bold |
While we're very happy to have you in the Gulch and appreciate your wanting to fully engage, some things in the Gulch (e.g. voting, links in comments) are a privilege, not a right. To get you up to speed as quickly as possible, we've provided two options for earning these privileges.
The Selectman from my town informed me that the State has it's claws on local generated tax money and we had to Fight to get some of it back!
I said...(you know what I advised already)...well, don't give it to them in the first place.
The same would go for the State versus the Federal Government.
Just a thought.
I also agree with your taxes solution. At least it would be a step in the right direction.
US Senators were originally elected by their respective State Assemblies. Governors only became involved in the event of the departure of a sitting Senator between election years. The 18th Amendment changed that and made Senators popularly elected. The main instigator was a Senator from Montana who bribed the legislators in Helena to keep putting him in as Senator. He was a mining magnate and one of the richest men in the nation at that point in time.
This is one of the Amendments I would rescind if at all possible. The result has been the gradual diminishing of State influence in National policy-making.
I also think that the States individually should be responsible for supporting their elected Congressional representatives - and Staffs. Make them beholden to the States they supposedly represent for fraud investigations, etc.
The vicissitudes of the events of these days cause me to choose between depression and cynicism. I choose the most entertaining......
I am not disparaging those that have hopes and dreams and thoughts about what could/should/can be done and I wish them the best and thank them for their efforts and concerns
Trump and the NRA has endorsed Strange.
But I keep thinking about an irksome anonymous anti-Moore commercial that supposedly has nothing to do with Strange.
Yeah, right. And I'm Peter Pan.
The endorsement of ‘Big Luther’ could prove to be a big boost for the interim Alabama senator, who is trailing his opponent, former state judge Roy Moore, in some public polls. But even Trump seemed unsure that the endorsement was the right move.
“I’ll be honest, I might have made a mistake,” Trump told the crowd at one point during his nearly 90 minutes of remarks.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/p...
IMO, statements Moore made were deliberately taken out of context. He is even in favor of a 30-round magazine like the 9mm carbine I have in a closet.
Moore is for the wall on the Mexican border. His statements that the military needed to be there now and we couldn't have a wall around the country were twisted around to "prove" Moore didn't want a wall at all.
For a week I've been swaying from one candidate to the other but I think you can tell who I'm having a growing trust issue with.
Strange has said Moore would have a harder time against the Democrat candidate.
In red state Alabama? Hogwash!
I have an Alabama fan brother who went to USC.
Then he got a job there "running the store" in his own words.
From there he retired and now lives in Delaware with an old girlfriend.
He's the only lib of my four brothers.
Now he's reminds me of Caligula. who had toys that did not go boom. May Kim come to the same end.
http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/report/
Thomas Jefferson