While we're very happy to have you in the Gulch and appreciate your wanting to fully engage, some things in the Gulch (e.g. voting, links in comments) are a
privilege, not a right. To get you up to speed as quickly as possible, we've provided two options for earning these privileges.
- You must reach a Gulch score of 100. You can earn points in the Gulch by posting content, commenting, or by other members voting up your posts.
- You may upgrade to a Galt's Gulch Producer membership to immediately gain these privileges.
Your current Gulch score:
Many do not want to go backwards-they want to go forward. Create a country that has freedoms consistent with natural rights. The US wasn't perfect, it was just the best the world had seen. You are missing a key point in the story. Without ridding the world of the idea of altruism, all Dagny was doing was helping her enemies perpetuate the very system destroying her.
When people vote with their feet, it is the single most powerful statement that they mean business. not hothead, not rhetoric. The decision does not come without cost.
But, more importantly, why should I be the one to leave? I'm the one who wants America back the way it *was* and the way the Founding Fathers meant it to *be*. Why should I surrender it to socialist idiots who are carbon copies of socialist idiots who can be found anywhere else? Let THEM surrender their U.S. citizenship and go to the socialist countries that agree with their philosophy, while I, and people like me, stay here and restore the philosophy of individual liberty upon which the nation was founded.
Already, you can hear the leftist talking heads trying to accuse those of us wishing to restore the republic as trying to change America; as if they hadn't already changed it horribly in the past century. All in the name of the "public good".
I think you and a bunch of other people pointing out these risks will cause people to avoid them. Good stories trick you into not thinking about the politics but getting inside an imaginary character's head; from that point people see things in a new way.
Consider Orson Scott Card's and Arthur C Clarke's futures dominated by conflict with the Soviet Union. OTOH they got a lot right.
Just twenty years ago there were gatekeepers to being published. Now anyone can start a blog or TV channel almost for free. There are little world-wide communities (Tribes, to use Seth Godin's term) of people with narrow interests tinkering and working to make their little corner of the world better.
Freedom is fragile, but I don't see it going away. I think it's on the rise.
Surrendering citizenship, leaving the U.S.... that's Galt's way. I far prefer Dagny's. Dagny was the one who fought to *preserve* her heritage, to maintain her link to an honorable, rational past which she loved and wanted to restore.
No matter what society Galt replaced the current one with, it would never be the U.S. again. That's the pricetag of Going Galt.
More like a medieval catapult...one way, and very destructive.
Its my book coming true, before my eyes. Its unsettling as hell.
Sure there is plenty of fight left in me but what's the point of fighting for a people who'd just as soon see you put into bondage?
I love that Americans hear "disruptive" and think that's a good thing. It's almost a buzzword that's lost its meaning b/c everyone wants "disruptive innovation"; people say it without even thinking.
I love the American spirit.
I, of course, am in the 9%. My life is considerably happier outside of the states. The de facto freedom where I live is considerably higher., the cost of living much lower. I have more time to devote to the kinds of issues we talk about in here. If I were still in the States, I would not have that luxury.