Yeah, pffft! I used to subscribe to The Science Times. I read years of it. Decades ago I started reacting to it with increasing skepticism, and disgust. Finally, the meager dribble of articles from astronomy or geology were insufficient incentive to wade through the rest of the sewage they were printing.

The NYT may be #1 in fake news, but the competition for that award is intense!

Translation of "All the news that is fit to print" = All the news that is fit to propagandize.

I'm disappointed the writer didn't mention climate change, which is the biggest fake science of all.

I know that but that's where all the bull crap started and filtered down the progressive rabbit hole.

I think you miss the point of the article, it is not about the AMA.

The AMA was corrupt from the day it was established. To think that these creatures actually have your best interests at heart are sadly mistaken!
There is not an open mind to be found...that is to say, IF they had a mind in the first place.
If they really had a mind and a conscience their Subconscious would never leave them alone...they would go crazy and kill themselves!

Just goes to prove that even a stopped clock (the usually clueless author of this article who buys into everything the medical establishment tells him) gets it correct once in a while.
Fortunately there are some who have open minds about effective therapies that aren't acceptable to the AMA.
I agree with the conclusion that the NYT is biased rubbish in many cases, but not with his reasoning.