You are really on it, guy!

Term2, I like the way you think!

Not only women are NOT infallible, some of them are downright evil. It is a well known fact, don't make them saints now in the name of politics and PC.

As all movements, the women's rights pushed this issue to the stratosphere, with predictable results.

Decades ago when the woman's movement first raised its ugly head, the same stages were exposed, such as now. It'll blow over again, although it'll claim many victims in the process. Kavanaugh almost became one but thanks to the levelheaded moves of GOP Senators and Grassley, the move was defeated. But not everyone has that protection.

As if women are infallible. This is my current bathroom reader with the cover it came with~
https://www.theworks.co.uk/p/true-cri...
If it had come with the cover below, I doubt I would have bought it~
https://www.amazon.com/Evil-Women-Dea...

The left is claiming that "the word of the woman is sufficient" when claiming sexual assault.

No proof let alone investigation are warranted.

Very good points. When I see a mob loudly chanting, “We believe survivors!!!”, I imaging them saying, “We believe accusers!!!” While wearing dunce caps.

The image would make a good political cartoon.

"Mob mentality" are two words that now comes to mind.

Yep! Just one of the big lies.

I never knew that slavery was promoted by the dems. I understand a lot more about the formation of the country and how slavery wasnt completely eliminated from the get go. There was opposition to the elimination of slavery and the founding fathers just couldnt get the votes together if they attacked slavery right awat- because a lot of the people were dependent on slavery for their livelihood, plus what would have happened if the thousands of slaves were suddenly freed with no education or resources or skills- mayhem.

Interesting how the dems make us all think that its the repubs who are against blacks now, when it really was the dems.

There are several problems with this statement. To start with, "surviivors" is bait. Fortunately VERY few rape victims are killed, so calling them "survivors" is overkill.

Secondly, it involves circular logic. Just because somebody claims to have been raped does not make hem a rape victim The only way to make this statement make ANY sense is the interpretation that ALL claimants are telling the truth, which is obviously not the case.

I think they should have 7 days to file an accusation, period. I wonder if that has to have congressional approval, or Trump can just make it so

A D'Souza movie I saw showed that too.

And some also wait until the last minute to try and stop a conservative from coming into power.
Just ask George Soros and/or Gloria Allred .

Wasnt Byrd the senator in the KKK also? A good book is by Dinesh D'Souza showing how it was the dems who were in favor of slavery, and the repubs against it.

they seem to wait for the supposed accused to come into money or power that they can tap into

Amen.

George Wallace was a Democrat, though I recall him running as an independent one whole time.

Me dino supposes these so-called survivors weren't murdered after being raped, groped or whatever.
Why did I just think of Joe Biden?
Anyhoo, instead of survivors, I call them all accusers. An accuser can both tell the truth or lie. Heck, even do both!
False accusers have taken revenge by making all kinds of stuff up since the dawn of the first spoken language.

Exactly !! Who one want sex with is more than likely to be an emotional reaction on the spur of the moment.

Another way to fix this problem is to give the woman 7 days to log a sexual harrassment claim. After that, there cannot be a claim. At least then, a man knows if his life will be destroyed, it will happen within 7 days instead of 36 years !!

In the future dates may need to be recorded,
“First I need your consent to record this conversation?”
“Uh, Yes.”
“Ok, What gender do you identify as?”
“What! Can’t you tell!”
“I need to ask these questions so I can reduce my liability just in case.”
“Well, I’m a girl. A horny girl. (Wink.)”
“No, I need to know your gender. Which gender do you identify as?”
“I identify as a impatient female!”
“Got that. Just one more question. Do you consent t...”
“Not anymore! I’ve completely lost my moment! I am leaving!”

Democrats were the ones wanting slavery and the KKK. Its part of history that the MSM wants to hide.

This cultural phonomenon change really means that women are pricing themselves out of the market, so to speak. Not worth it to risk ones future just for some quick sex. Its coming down to a video deposition is needed before sex where the woman agrees she wants it. Kind of a turn off to be sure.

They arent survivors even unless they actually survived "something". If the claims were false, the real survivors are the men who were accused.

Survivors my ass! Any 17 year old boy who tried to cop a feel is subject to sexual assault charges. Every damn one of us guys here heard the word No many times before we herd Go.

What is amazing is that the stupid girl ever admitted to anything. I guarantee Bazy-Ford will never do that....even if something as certain as video evidence was somehow produced proving her a liar. Unfortunately young men in these situations have to prove their innocence.