Religious morality is not based on "biology and the laws of existence"; living for a supernatural realm is the opposite of the requirements for human life; "Bicameral tongue" makes no sense.

That is not what "Rand talks about". There are no unconscious "humanoids" and man is neither good nor evil by "nature". The nature of human life is the standard of the good. Humans do not "follow their nature based in their biology at the cellular level"; we make choices with our minds or default on the necessity to think and choose in order to live.

The basic nature of man, (human beings-emphasis on 'Being'), is good. It is the nature of Humanoids-(not being, not conscious, no conscience) that is inherently evil.
This is where things get mucked up...Human Beings follow their nature based in their biology at the cellular level...Rand talks about that.
You've seen me reference this as: Rational 'Celf' interest.

Jordan Peterson talks about that too from a biological/Psychological perspective.

I have thought that on a desert island, man is in tune with nature, OR he dies (prematurely at least).
Once you add humans to the mix AND you want peace and cooperation, about the only way I have ever seen is to adopt objectivist views on the nature of human beings. Its not that hard really. Socialism is much harder to figure out, and it doesnt even work.

Sadly mankind still humanizes something bigger than himself to account to, when it's just the ways of existence, consequences of our own making and failing to see the big picture.

I like Ben Shapiro's reliance on facts, but then he goes to a mystical basis when it comes to the nature of man. Too bad really. And he thinks HIS god is the real one. May the real god please stand up !

They may speak or reference in a bicameral mystical way but it was the big picture morality, behavior and responsibility that are the key take a ways...most people don't get that and think it's all about a guy in the sky when it's simply the consequences of our biology and the laws of existence that bring us to these moral conclusions.
Yes, it's a shame it is still spoken in a bicameral tongue.

Levin is a joy to watch when he interviews. The purpose of the interview is to "interview" and bring out what the guest has to say. Levin's podcasts are less refreshing, but he does have a lot of good to say.

He is a straight shooter, which is nice. His religious stuff is annoying and useless, and I ignore all of that. He was the best FOX had to offer, but he got on the wrong side of the whole woman movement, and they had to get rid of him.

Fox now is pretty much useless. I watch Levin, who is a good interviewer and has interesting guests, but I have to subtract out his useless religious crap. At least when he is interviewing, he shuts up and just tries to get the guests to talk.

I think he makes a lot of $$ and has freedom where he is at. Youtube is the news now

My thoughts exactly...as I just commented on your other comment.

Maybe they'll get O'Reilly to come over to the Blaze...don't know...Bill has always been a hard sell.

It seems most of the conservatives, like O'Reilly, Beck, Levin, Shapiro, etc. mix religion in with their conservatism. Saying that the basis of their arguments rests on some book that has been handed down by a mythical "person" who is all powerful but we cant see or touch- really weakens their arguments. Plus the fact there are hundreds of religions and gods out there, making their selection of the "right" god very tenuous and hard to believe.

O'Reilly probably makes too much money to join this group, but it would be nice.

MSM is pretty much dead to me now.

MSM is dead, hopefully forever. I have stopped watching even FOX, with their eye candy bimbos and pandering to liberals.

Hannity probably makes too much money from FOX to move over to a platform like this. Tucker Carlson is way too intellectually compromised for me, and why they have Juan Williams as the token black escapes me. Judge Jeanine is ok actually. Bill O'Reilly was their best commentator, but he is now more interesting than ever on his own youtube channel.

Yes...with a good portion of the people we like to listen to...all in one place.

It'll be great once they get it all sorted out. The Tech's have a big job ahead of them.

It's great that we finally have a real alternative to the lamestream media.

I like levin also. Becks religiosity doesn't bother me, I like how Beck gets to the bottom of things, he's got great people around him and shares a Lot of history none of us ever learned.

That victory is ours, for now we have a good source for truth, accurate history and what better constitutionalist than Mark Levin.

Personally, viewing the alternative media for 10 years now, This is an unbeatable combination.