Environmentalists’ Marching Orders for Human Extinction
Posted by ZenRoy 6 years, 7 months ago to Government
I found this to be an interesting read, thought others may do so as well.
While we're very happy to have you in the Gulch and appreciate your wanting to fully engage, some things in the Gulch (e.g. voting, links in comments) are a privilege, not a right. To get you up to speed as quickly as possible, we've provided two options for earning these privileges.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
If you agree this is the problem, then continue reading. Otherwise stop wasting my time. I did not assert it is the problem.
Individual choice is clearly the first, correct approach for everything, until one individual's choice compels another to servitude.
With >60% of our government's funding going to social programs, a case can be made for population being an issue. I am not making this case here; however, if I have to repeat myself again, I'm going to assume this is a religious argument...again.
There is a topic on this.
One person’s evil is another person’s road to Utopia.
/s
Of course, there would be exemptions for this procedure.
No check of premise is needed. If anyone is in favor of population control these two things are true. The only exception is if you leave it up to the individual and then its no longer population control, its simply personal choice as it should be.
It is not necessary to start soylent green. Time is our friend. population can be controlled by not adding to it, vs subtracting from it.
The question is what is bestial behavior? My guess would be that we may have different definitions of the term.
What science is the need for an action of population control based on?
Who has the right to enforce it?
Think about the kind of power this suggests giving to governments, or some other collective group. It would an utter loss of all freedom to allow anyone to have this kind of power.
the solution is not in controls, its in capitalism. As a society gets free markets they become more affluent. As they become more affluent the free market expands creating even greater wealth.
As a society becomes more wealthy they have resources to put towards things like pollution, energy use, deforestation and they will because they have the resources and want to have a forest area to go camp in, hike in....
All of these things as well as self governing population occur when free markets are allowed to increase wealth. The rich get richer, so do the poor. Children are no longer assets but expenses and as a result fewer people choose to have children and those that do have fewer of them.
There is a great chapter on this in "enlightenment now" which puts all kinds of data behind it.
Any other method requires tyranny to do it. Some one must have tyrannical power. I am against that. I am for the natural evolution that occurs for the environment when a free market is allowed to be free.
It was only a reference for first hand information/knowledge.
The fact remains that some humanoids (by OUC) behave like beasts when it comes to animals. It only proves their own degradation.
Of course all of these destructive paths will leave only the enlightened surviving, who will dedicate themselves to saving the planet, undoing any remaining human filthy byproducts left behind. Exactly how they do this remains just a pious vision, like a godless religion.
It is the naive stupidity of the environmentalist believers that has made the globalist elite their allies. The globalists have sold the environmentalists on the idea that the only way to enact their vision is through a global government with absolute power. Of course where the two groups differ wildly is in what the end game is, and the objectives sought. While the environmentalists seek a greatly reduced population, the globalists really don't care how many people there are, so long as they exercise absolute control. The environmentalists' end game is saving the planet, while the globalists' end game is all power and wealth to the globalist elite. As to the survivors, should population reduction is a result, the globalists don't give a rat's patootie about planet saving, but care very much that they and their like minded cohorts are the survivors.
I get a big laugh out of all the "lost dog/lost cat" entreaties I see on various neighborhood networks. "Oh, my dog is just like my child; but he got out of the fence and I must have him back," My answer to that is always the same - Oh really? You allow your children out to run on the streets and don't secure the doors and fences around your home?
Maybe a call to CPS is in order, then.
If there is really AGW or similar issue, limiting the population to contributors, and culling the inordinate number of parasites is an obvious solution.
Not even if the New Yellow Times is the target for destruction.
Radical environmentalists are insane and completely out of touch with reality.
In my view PETA is an acronym for People Eating Tasty Animals.
My view also includes homo sapiens as a rational being that uses technology to make life more than just survival and tries to maintain an environment that is as benign as possible for all species that do not threaten homo sapiens.
Load more comments...