Nothing is ever truly deleted on the internet. I am sure the attorneys will be reviewing these types of pronouncements. It seems the reporters should be reporting not judging. Many journalists and public figures on Twitter have deleted previous posts slamming a group of MAGA hat-wearing teens for allegedly taunting a Native American vet, after more footage was released disputing the initial story. From CNN’s Jake Tapper to Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams, many on the internet are sharing a fuller explanation of the initial viral story.
[…]
Recode editor and New York Times contributing op-ed writer Kara Swisher, for instance, deleted one tweet saying she was thinking of “finding every one of these shitty kids and giving them a very large piece of my mind,” and other tweets throwing slurs like “Nazi” and “nationalist.” Sinclair chief political correspondent Scott Thurman deleted a tweet alleging students in MAGA hats were “mocking” and “taunting” a Native American in front of the Lincoln Memorial in D.C., asking in a new tweet if the new video changed minds about the kids.
Anti-Trump activist Ed Krassenstein deleted a neutral tweet contemplating the intentions of Nick Sandmann, the young MAGA student accused of smirking at a Native American. His brother, Brian Krassenstein, deleted a tweet calling the students “bigoted.” The New Republic‘s Jeet Heer deleted a tweet arguing the MAGA hat-wearing teens were “racist.” CNN’s Bakari Sellers deleted a tweet suggesting the kids should be “punched in the face.”

I hope the family earns at least a billion dollars and puts a big dent in this leftist postmodernism marxist craziness machine.

They did show negligence on behalf of a "narrative" in their stories. But this is being described only in such terms. No one is challenging the multicultural ethnicity binge on which it is based. What if a group of teenagers had mocked an ethnic protestor mindlessly beating his drum? So what? Why should that be national news, and why should the multicultural ethnicity mongering be accepted as a premise by which everything is being judged?

This is the same philosophical concession being made to Cortez promoting her contrived "facts" on behalf of a false morality -- with the criticism ignoring the false moral standard https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post...