Exactly, your opinion. What electromagnetic property would cause an orbit as opposed to a direct line. What is resonating and what is causing the resonating?

I'm telling you as someone who has looked into the electric universe and is educated on the subject. Your first contradiction is ignoring in your daily life the fact that gravity is metaphysically given and necessary. Your second is believing that electromagnetism doesn't weaken over distance, when coloumbs law is that force between charges is reduced by the square of the distance.

We are both open minded, but only one of us as the properly integrated knowledge required to understand what our open mind is being told.

You know, you've made me think, not about your beliefs, but of your metaphysical contradictions. I will have a section in video 1: metaphysics for you.

Telling you its not happening bro

How can I believe you when you think magnets have the same force regardless of distance? The electric universe is not taking over, as it can never remove the fact that gravity exists. We can learn more but we cannot disprove a theory by learn more about it.
It is taking over Christian arguments about why the earth is flat, but that is meaningless to reality.

F= kq1q2/r^2

The r^2 in the denominator means the force weaks as the distance increases. It is the fundamental law of electromagnetic force.

The Laniakea video, and the great attractor would be because of gravity.
"This is because gravitation is an attractive force, but if there is an underdense region it apparently acts as a gravitational repeller. That's because there may be less attraction in the direction of the underdensity, and the greater attraction due to the higher density in other directions acts to pull objects away from the underdensity.[Tsvi Piran, “On Gravitational Repulsion”, General Relativity and Gravitation, November 1997, Volume 29, Issue 11, pp 1363–1370, https://link.springer.com/article/10....]"

You are making shit up. I took astrophysicists, my wife is a theoretical physicist. You are talking out your ass.

Also electromagneticism is an inverse square law. It weakens over distance too
F=kqq/r^2. Have you ever played with magnets?

Holds what together? The universe is expanding as if our connections were weakening...

In all honesty, I don't see your point. Gravity exists, and it may be the result of electromagnetics, but electromagnetics might be a result of gravity, plus we still have the weak and strong forces. All of these used to be one, and then at different temperatures throughout the expansion these broke down into parts. Suggesting the big bang was caused by a coulomb explosion doesn't remove the fact that gravity exists and plays a role that is not obviously electromagnetic, and therefore can be defined mathematics apart from em. What's the point or essence you are trying to explore here?

Yes charges are the building blocks we call them quarks and atoms and molecules. If you want, spin is the building blocks.

There can be nothing outside of the universe. Anything outside would require that there is a gap of nothingness. That's impossible. You must be an atlas society religious nut. Go read OPAR