Does a person have to die to be free?
Posted by edweaver 10 years, 8 months ago to Government
The “Genie, You’re Free” post brought this question to my mind again so thought I would open it to discussion.
Is death the only way to rid yourself of government? When you break it down to this level, is that right?
I don’t intend this to be a morbid discussion nor am I encouraging people to off themselves because of something that may get stated on this topic. Life is still worth living, at least in my opinion but why is death the only way to get that monkey off your back. Is that really the way life is intended. I don’t think so. How do we ever get government out of our lives? What is the better solution?
Is death the only way to rid yourself of government? When you break it down to this level, is that right?
I don’t intend this to be a morbid discussion nor am I encouraging people to off themselves because of something that may get stated on this topic. Life is still worth living, at least in my opinion but why is death the only way to get that monkey off your back. Is that really the way life is intended. I don’t think so. How do we ever get government out of our lives? What is the better solution?
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
Being in reality does not mean you are not free. Freedom with no context for any being at all (reality) is impossible and a floating abstraction.
Death is by definition truly death. IF it was "just a transition" then it is not in fact death. There is zero evidence of this so by what we do know it is not so. Asserting the positive otherwise requires evidence. It is not required for others to prove some universal negative.
Please don't use such sloppy ungrounded logic.
state which we experience when we discard outside
boundaries, as Rand did, and think for ourselves,
IMHO. it is the route to invention, love, conviction
and peace. Never Give Up your inner freedom!!! -- j
There was a damned good reason the Founding Fathers did NOT want either a Monarch or a Regency for our government, and damned if they're not working their butts off to form one... and so far it has created EXACTLY what said Founding Fathers were determined not to let happen here.
Not sure we will be able to get rid of all government, as there will still need to be people to make decisions regarding public works, etc.
Looks like space access is about to be privatized, that should speed things up considerably.
50 to 100 years - tops.
Sea-Cities could be much sooner.
We just need to motate!
(My word for motivate and get moving.)
Jan
Both need moons. Mars a bigger one than Phobos & Deimos, and a good sized one for Venus. Maybe Mercury? I'd prefer Pluto, due to its atmospheric gasses and size, but Ganymede or Titan would do for Venus. Their large size makes scaling them in to Venus more difficult, of course.
We then bombard Venus with icy asteroids and small planetary moons, in timed collisions, some of which would blow off part of the atmosphere, and then the introduction of genetically engineered organisms to separate the H2SO4 out of the atmosphere; although that new oxygen-fixing product mentioned in another post might prove invaluable.
Of course, the process will take a little while...
What do you make on it?
Jan
Or Venusia... Neutralize the Greenhouse gasses, remove the caustics and toxins from the atmosphere, and cool it down.
Load more comments...