Texas Court Rules That Police May Introduce Illegally-Gathered Evidence At Trial
Posted by gonzo309 11 years, 10 months ago to Government
They'll illegally search first then they'll get a warrant later.
All Comments
- 1Posted by gonzo309 11 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.This the first case I've ever heard of like this. It's judicial activism at its worst. We'll see how any appeal goes.| Permalink
- 1Posted by khalling 11 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.This is a ripple effect from a Supreme Court decision. And no surprise law and order texas took advantage of it.| Permalink
- 1Posted by gonzo309 11 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.My son moved to Austin this summer. I told him to open his eyes and watch what goes on. They just had SXSW this past week with ~100 open carry participants. Last year the TSA was there. Times are going to get interesting!| Permalink
- 1Posted by gonzo309 11 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.He's probably working a plea deal by informing on others. I can't believe that a judge allowed that. Must be a recent appointee from the current administration.| Permalink
- 2Posted by Zenphamy 11 years, 10 months agoSo what part of "shall not be violated, and no Warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause,…" do these people not understand. A CI's comment is not probable cause. It's not even reasonable suspicion, since the CI's being paid.| Permalink
