Why affordable housing isn't affordable

Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 4 months ago to Business
37 comments | Share | Flag

Bloomberg is notorious for pretending government is the solution rather than the problem and housing is no exception. The problem of not enough cheap housing stems from several regulations and regulatory climates - not from income levels. It used to be that on the US Census records, many were listed as "Boarders" - ie people who stayed in someone else's home and paid a small fee to have their meals provided and laundry done. Government did away with this source of cheap housing by mandating hospitality permits for such activities at the behest of the hotel industry - who they then began to hit with large fees for water and energy consumption!

Next you have zoning boards, who decide whether or not a particular property can house a residential, industrial, or commercial entity. And they pay property taxes based on their zoning, incentivizing government to push people into the higher-tax commercial and industrial areas.

What other ways can you think of that contribute to the lack of affordable housing?


All Comments

  • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I know a lot of people who could open his head from 200 yards, but "open his brain"? You need an electron microscope instead of a scoped sight.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    LOL. While a biopsy may be interesting, I tend to think that negative emotions only shrink the relative size of the brain by cutting off the use of other parts. Now that might make for a fascinating research paper: to examine via CT the relative sizes of active brain areas in people with prolonged exposure to a variety of strong emotions...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mia767ca 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    scary, but i think you are right...will you hold him while open his brain to examine it...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You might want to go see Dinesh D'Souza's "Hillary's America". The problem wasn't slavery, but lynching and racial disparity because of the Democrats.

    And I would absolutely go back to a government of the size and scope of 100 years ago...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 4 months ago
    "Government did away with this source of cheap housing "
    Just as with other things the gov't did away with (drugs, sex trade, undocumented workers), people who want a room to rent can still find one.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "A man's property should be his decision to do what he wants with it. "
    This is the spirit of the Third Amendment.
    "When will we elect a government like we had during the 19th century?"
    We really don't want that. Many people's basic rights were not respected. We had out-and-out slavery for part of the century. No women could vote. We have big problems, but I don't want to go back to the old days.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by bassboat 9 years, 4 months ago
    I'm from the camp that believes that if I want to have a boarder in my house then it is my decision. A man's property should be his decision to do what he wants with it. If I wanted to build a casino in any town in America that should be my right but no, we have to ask permission from the government to do anything. When will we elect a government like we had during the 19th century? We've been massively screwed up since 1913.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The Great Stagnation. And unfortunately unless we repeal some of these regulations, laws and taxes, its going to turn into the Greatest Depression.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mia767ca 9 years, 4 months ago
    Obama is bragging about creating 18 million jobs...90% of which are minimum wage part-time jobs...7 million full-time high wage jobs have been destroyed during his rule...Hillarybeast will continue with the grand redo...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 9 years, 4 months ago
    The whole so-called profession of urban planning is a cartel run by existing property owners to keep the prices of real estate, and especially homes, as high as possible by creating an artificial shortage of it. These gains come at the expense of people who own unbuilt land, as well as of people trying to obtain homes. (And the taxpaying public, since park and open-space districts are part of the planning machine.)

    Like the problem of the federal government grabbing up most of the land in western states, I don't see very many legal methods to fight back against this menace. Most plans for "Gulch" style communities begin with buying up the land. But if legal title is not available, how do we create moral title, much less defend it? A brainstorming session on these questions might prove useful.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I live in a sub-division with a do-nothing HOA. Personally I like it that way. I will gladly pay my $205 a year for them to continue to do nothing. It gets some people out of the house to meet and complain or pontificate and go home feeling better. Some go out for a snack afterwards. All I can say to my HOA in all sincerity is, keep up the bad work.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hot_Black_Desiato 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Here is the irony. Define Government.

    HOA's are a microcosm of Government, imposed by a small group of people authorized by the covenants of the deed authorized county government.

    So you have Federal, State, Local, which would be city, and county, and also the HOA's.

    gov·ern·ment
    ˈɡəvər(n)mənt/
    noun
    1.the governing body of a nation, state, or community.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 4 months ago
    What is "affordable?"
    Some years ago, the government made purchasing houses very easy. People who should have bought $100K houses, bought $150K houses and after a few years of not being able to afford the payment, defaulted. In the past it was advised to keep a mortgage because the falling value of money would make the payments cheaper and falling interest rates would make it still more advantageous. But then, taxes, fees, HOA dues, insurance costs made that advice fallacious. The rising cost of everything and the stagnation of income has caused people to re-think the old American dream of the house, the car, 2.4 children and a dog.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo