Yes as long as "all things" are existing things that can with those new instruments be found out so like with Richard Feynmann you get the pleasure of finding things out.
As for value in all things, that is true only with respect to living things. Otherwise, there is no value to the Universe.

Looking forward to that. I will go easy with you since most of your kind got extinct some time ago. How did you manage survive like you bird brethren.

You must be trying to say that you are skeptical of the article and perhaps agreeing with it too.
If so, that's OK by me.
+1X2 for having the right to your opinion.
Me dino be big on free speech.

Maybe more like the guy in Lil Abner with the little cloud following him everywhere where nature is after him.

Good eve OUC , is your book available for purchase? The name ? I would love to read it.
I don't enough about the movements of the magnetosphere to confirm or deny, but cycles are
Certainly feasible.

Notice that when you measure motion or for that matter, any kind of change, that in order to describe that change some time factor in needed as in velocity, power, energy, momentum, etc. That is in the real world. In mathematics, reality related calculus, which is the mathematics of change, has time in the differential equations . Where time is not explicitly given, such as a changing variable, there is a kind of hidden time factor, in that, if the variable were real, it would take a time factor to have a variable pass through a range of values.

No, I am saying that in science when someone says that you have to think out of the box, you probably have come upon a religious minded individual in his little trance state selectively thinking of some profound new discovery, that you are told that you need to open your mind (like being told to open your closed mind to know God), to see what I am saying about the workings of nature. I am saying that thinking out of the box, if useful, might get you out of that boxed in trance state or help in solving contrived brain teaser puzzles. Nature is not that kind of brain teaser.

Great link!...thanks

Absolutely...Check out the work done by suspicious0bservers.org...there is enough free video material to get a sense of it.

Yes, we may find that there is some connection there or find that that connection no longer exists. I think, do to the integrated nature and dependencies of all things that it is more than probable that cycles and mechanisms can die and new one's come along.

The only way to know for sure is to Integrate the knowledge of every field possible. Actually it's one of the main ideas in my "Wide Scope Accountability" concept I promote in my book.

Invisible forces are hard to comprehend . Electromagnetic fields and the relation to and the location of ancient monoliths is another interesting subject.+1 OUC and Dino.

Hello Irshultis,
Sage advice. It is wise to be skeptical and I will neither accept blindly, nor dismiss out of hand interesting theories not yet proven fact or fiction. After all, it was once accepted scientific theory that the sun revolved around the earth... And Einsteins general theory of relativity was not given much credence until 1919, when during a total solar eclipse, Sir Arthur Eddington performed the first successful experimental test of note. :)
Yes, it may be fringe science, but it is an enjoyable muse, so long as one does not assert it as fact.
Respectfully,
O.A.

Never mind, I see where you stand. No point in further discussion; my warning stands.

How who differ, in your opinion? This guy from genuine science, or this guy from crackpots?

No belief systems here, just considerations knowing full well that knowledge will evolve closer and closer to what is. We don't have a lock on it and each learned lesson and each observed circumstance with better and better Technology to observe it will enhance our understanding of things. Remember, there is a bit of truth, a bit of value in all things, otherwise, those things would never have a leg to stand on.

Just have care when believing fringe science. If you are not an expert in a subject, there is no good reason to pretend that you understand a subject. Especially when it comes to quantum physics and general relativity and simple things like space and time or space-time when the finite speed of light enters the study.
I will be nice and not refer you to Uncle Al but just reference you to:

http://www.crank.net/physics.html

I'll pick on you below.

No worries mate...charlie brown your not.
(an old song: "why's everybody always picken on me" "charlie brown") Don't know if that came from the Peanuts" comic strip or the other way around.)

So you are saying that this electric universe theory is "a cleverly contrived puzzle where the solution is purposely hidden from the solver."
I'm just an old dino, who would have chopped apart the Gordian knot not for cleverness, mind you, but out of sheer roaring frustration,"
So please explain further.

Exactly...only a measurement is my thought...Read a Masters thesis with the title: Time is a measurement between large and small events...seems to me, as you state, that would infer motion of some sort.

You miss the part where it has been proven...abet, until we learn more and others are willing to learn it. The ladder seems to be a problem with the establishment.

There was no thinking of the out box. Edison and others who invented electric lights as well as those who came before connect what is known about reality to whether something better might be possible. The ancients dreamed of flight after observing birds in flight. It is not the same as thinking out of the box to solve a cleverly contrived puzzle where the solution is purposely hidden from the solver.

Reread the article...you'll see how they differ.

But that proof has to be with evidence and some plausible connection on how that evidence relates to the hypothesis and then the hard part of placing the theory in an iron clad scientific notation that can be checked by other investigators and not just some come see what I think I have discovered that no one wants to look at, so I feel picked on!

The idea that time is a measurement of motion is correct. There is no stuff out there which is time.