- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
To be clear... I have no problem with foreigners being here in the US and working... as long as they did so legally, without special programs and politically-based incentives. It's the political wink-and-nod that IMO is pretty damned treasonous.
Point - I watched a good friend (been here since the 60's, carried a green card all that time, and was a damned productive member of society) get her citizenship a couple years back. She could have gotten US citizenship years ago, after marrying a US citizen. She refused to do so - because she didn't feel she had *earned* her place to have the privilege of being a US citizen.
By definition, an immigrant must be legal.
You pretty much expressed my view on the subject, without all my emotion-induced vitriol.
It is predominantly the free ride I am opposed to. Their free ride comes at my expense. I do not want to support moochers.
The secondary issue is the dilution of the culture of what was America. These illegal immigrants are being encouraged to migrate here so that they can further the political agenda of Democrat looters by turning Texas and Arizona into blue states. This is the major part of the fundamental transformation of America that Obama promised during his 2008 campaign. These immigrants have no intention of assimilating into the culture of American exceptionalism, and their looter supporters have no intention of them assimilating either.
"Hiring" implies pay, which implies training these "new UN-citizens" that one should work for personal gain, rather than the common social good. They should be HONORED to join her view of labor for all for the "good of the (e)state.."...
Just hit me... THAT'S why the huge push to make these illegals semi-citizens - by removing their "illegal alien" status, they can be put to work for the elite dems, who won't be able to be censured (or fined) by hiring "illegal aliens".
1) Speak English
2) Own your own home.
3) Live in any structure larger than 100 sq. ft per occupant.
4) Raise your own children.
5) Think.
6) Exist.
Throwing lead bullets at high velocity (with proper training) not only stops the rock throwing of the moment, but indicates to fellow rock-throwers that maybe throwing rocks at border patrol agents might be... unhealthy.
That's not "rebellion against lawful authority".
That's an act of war.
At one time, the rock-throwing sling was a weapon of war, btw.
I think it is the principle of rebellion against lawful authority that makes me feel very little sympathy. You think the people throwing rocks don't have the intention to cause injury - and even death? Do you deny someone the right to self-protection when so threatened?
I have a good friend who is a Border Patrol Agent. I would hate to see anything happen to him or his family as a result of this crap.
This idiocy does not surprise me at all.
Could provoke a strike too.
Either way the agents of destruction win.
But what impact does this have on American citizens within their 100 mi 'No Constitution' border check area?
Load more comments...