It's murderrrrrrrrrr

Posted by KevinSmith1281 11 years, 3 months ago to Government
21 comments | Share | Flag

Judge, jury, and executioner.

All Comments

  • Posted by freedomforall 11 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Then he has to be convicted in a state court. To paraphrase Glenda, the witch of the north to the witch of the west (sometimes called Hillary), "You have no pardon power here."
    (Except for the non-legal "pull" that we all despise.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Bobhummel 11 years, 3 months ago
    Committing acts of war against the U S allows for the revocation of ones citizenship. Our dear leader just wanted to skip an important step in a legal process- but such laws are for lesser leaders. Once the individual is no longer an American citizen, he/she can be designated an illegal combatant under the Geneva convention or as Hostis Humani Generis and taken out with a Lapua or a Predator.
    Cheers
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Bobhummel 11 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And that applies to every action and executive order. What will do the most damage to America's political standing in the world, the national economy (2.9% reduction in growth in Q1), the moral of the military, destruction of personal liberty, rights and responsibility, and the nation as a whole? That is what our dear leader will do.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Those are good points. Luckily, it takes more than just one person or branch of gov't to do so - both the exec and the jud.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, a legal process would have been appropriate. But when you believe you are beyond the law, those become irrelevancies.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Bobhummel 11 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    no worries mate. On Page 6 of any U S passport is a list of information 13. LOSS OF U S CITIZENSHIP. (2) taking an oath or making a declaration to a foreign state (3) serving in the armed forces of a foreign state ...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by KevinSmith1281 11 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Who should determine that an American citizen has committed an act of war against the US? Should we take the government at their word that somebody is a terrorist or has committed an act of war? Should we trust how they define those acts, not only now but in the future. Some members of congress declares the Tea Party to be behaving like terrorists over differences during debt ceiling negotiations.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Revocation of citizenship would have been a very easy mechanism to cause this to not be unconstitutional. But that would have taken one to understand the US Constitution, and we couldn't expect a guest lecturer on said document to actually understand it, now could we?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    No, all they believe in anymore is BAMN - By Any Means Necessary. They are not merely above the law, they are beyond the law. Laws do not apply to them.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by coaldigger 11 years, 3 months ago
    “First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out—
    because I was not a communist;
    Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
    because I was not a socialist;
    Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
    because I was not a trade unionist;
    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
    because I was not a Jew;
    Then they came for me—
    and there was no one left to speak out for me.”

    ― Martin Niemöller
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 11 years, 3 months ago
    Prosecute the one who ordered it. There is no immunity and no statue of limitations.
    Take them down. No more delays.
    (And when that is ongoing how about a real investigation into 9-11, too.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years, 3 months ago
    It doesn't require oversight as it's blatantly illegal on its face. An American citizen has a constitutional right to due process. NOBODY gets to take that away arbitrarily. If they aren't actively using arms to harm others, then they must be captured, advised of their rights, and then tried in the courts.

    This is a "high crime" and should be treated as such.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo